1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf01398256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error estimates for the combinedh andp versions of the finite element method

Abstract: Summary.In the h-version of the finite element method, convergence is achieved by refining the mesh while keeping the degree of the elements fixed. On the other hand, the p-version keeps the mesh fixed and increases the degree of the elements. In this paper, we prove estimates showing the simultaneous dependence of the order of approximation on both the element degrees and the mesh. In addition, it is shown that a proper design of the mesh and distribution of element degrees lead to a better than polynomial ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
82
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…possible by suitable refinement about the corner points to obtain arbitrarily large orders of convergence with respect to the number of degrees-of-freedom (see (3] integration by parts gives…”
Section: 'Nowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…possible by suitable refinement about the corner points to obtain arbitrarily large orders of convergence with respect to the number of degrees-of-freedom (see (3] integration by parts gives…”
Section: 'Nowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of this theorem is given in [16]. The significance of this theorem is that it joins theorems 3 and 4, making the constant C independent of both p and T. An inverse theorem exists but is not known as yet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now define (7.19) *a(*) = *i(x) + * 2 (r), * 2 (*) = *i(*)-tf 2 (x) so that (7.18) yields f = h x {x) (7.206) Here ^(JC) is unique, *|ii(0) = 0, while i|f 2 (jc) is unique up to the constant K such that *|i 2 (0) = 2ÜC. We first analyze (7.20a Then it is easy to see that FÊ^(T), F = ƒ x on 7 l3 F = 0 on 7 2 , 73 and because of (7.28), (7.31) and ( The mapping The theorem is therefore proven in the case that ƒ = 0 on three sides of S and hence it holds also if ƒ is gênerai but ƒ = 0 at the vertices ABCD. It remams to prove that in the gênerai case there exist # € £Pp(S) such that <ï > has the same traces at ABCD as ƒ and ll*lli,5« c |io||/i|| ia J-…”
Section: (64)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first theoretical paper appeared in 1981 (see [6]). See also [2,5,7,10,11,14] for most recent results. For the numerical, computational, implementational and engineering aspects of the h-p version we refer to [3,[21][22][23][24],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%