2018
DOI: 10.3934/mcrf.2018010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error estimates for Dirichlet control problems in polygonal domains: Quasi-uniform meshes

Abstract: The paper deals with finite element approximations of elliptic Dirichlet boundary control problems posed on two-dimensional polygonal domains. Error estimates are derived for the approximation of the control and the state variables. Special features of unconstrained and control constrained problems as well as general quasiuniform meshes and superconvergence meshes are carefully elaborated. Compared to existing results, the convergence rates for the control variable are not only improved but also fully explain … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Major theoretical and computational developments have been made in the recent past; see, e.g., [7, 16, 17, 19-21, 24-27, 42, 43, 45]. However, only in the last ten years have researchers developed thorough well-posedness, regularity, and finite element error analysis results for elliptic PDEs; see [1,5,18,33,46] and the references therein. One difficulty of Dirichlet boundary control problems is that the Dirichlet boundary data does not directly enter a standard variational setting for the PDE; instead, the state equation is understood in a very weak sense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major theoretical and computational developments have been made in the recent past; see, e.g., [7, 16, 17, 19-21, 24-27, 42, 43, 45]. However, only in the last ten years have researchers developed thorough well-posedness, regularity, and finite element error analysis results for elliptic PDEs; see [1,5,18,33,46] and the references therein. One difficulty of Dirichlet boundary control problems is that the Dirichlet boundary data does not directly enter a standard variational setting for the PDE; instead, the state equation is understood in a very weak sense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximating the solution of a Dirichlet boundary control problem can be very difficult since solutions frequently have low regularity. Rigorous convergence results have only been recently obtained for Dirichlet boundary control for the Poisson equation using the continuous Galerkin (CG) method [2,6,7,17,[28][29][30] and a mixed finite element method [19]. A potential weakness of the CG method is that the control and state spaces are coupled: the control space is the trace of the state space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mixed method allows the control and state spaces to be decoupled, which provides greater flexibility compared to the CG method; however, the degrees of freedom are larger than the CG scheme. It is worth mentioning that Apel et al in [2] is the first work to obtain a superlinear convergence rate for the control on convex polygonal domains if one uses a superconvergence mesh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical methods for second-order optimal control problems governed by Dirichlet BC have been studied in various articles (see, e.g., [5,10,28,33,34] for distributed control, [2,32] for boundary control, and references therein). For conforming and mixed finite element methods, superconvergence result of control has been derived in [11,12,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%