IEEE Military Communications Conference. Proceedings. MILCOM 98 (Cat. No.98CH36201)
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.1998.722160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error-control for tactical ATM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to now the problem was solved as it is described in [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. In the standard solution [2] ATM cell header (5 Bytes) is protected by one of the Bytes (the so called HEC-Byte), which allows correcting all single-bit errors in a 5-Byte header.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Up to now the problem was solved as it is described in [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. In the standard solution [2] ATM cell header (5 Bytes) is protected by one of the Bytes (the so called HEC-Byte), which allows correcting all single-bit errors in a 5-Byte header.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However it still needs for its implementation look up tables in encoder as well as in decoder. Other known solutions are described in [4][5][6][7][8] which however also need much more redundancy than the standard approach. Most of these schemes use more than one error control code in concatenated arrangement or separate code for header and separate one for payload.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation