2014
DOI: 10.3788/ope.20142210.2683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error compensation of tetrahedron magnetic gradiometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gang et al [14] calibrated the magnetic gradient tensor system using a linear calibration method, but two nonlinear conversions were used to linearize the nonlinear mathematical model of single vector magnetometer calibration, and the calculation process was complicated. Zhen-tao et al [15] achieved calibration of the tetrahedron magnetic gradiometer with the restriction of traceless and symmetric properties. Calibration matrixes were estimated with a genetic algorithm; however, the optimization algorithm was easily trapped into local optimization, and the convergent speed was slow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gang et al [14] calibrated the magnetic gradient tensor system using a linear calibration method, but two nonlinear conversions were used to linearize the nonlinear mathematical model of single vector magnetometer calibration, and the calculation process was complicated. Zhen-tao et al [15] achieved calibration of the tetrahedron magnetic gradiometer with the restriction of traceless and symmetric properties. Calibration matrixes were estimated with a genetic algorithm; however, the optimization algorithm was easily trapped into local optimization, and the convergent speed was slow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%