2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-016-1544-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Analysis of Modified Langevin Dynamics

Abstract: We consider Langevin dynamics associated with a modified kinetic energy vanishing for small momenta. This allows us to freeze slow particles, and hence avoid the re-computation of inter-particle forces, which leads to computational gains. On the other hand, the statistical error may increase since there are a priori more correlations in time. The aim of this work is first to prove the ergodicity of the modified Langevin dynamics (which fails to be hypoelliptic), and next to analyze how the asymptotic variance … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where Λ− is defined in (24). We next follow a discussion similar to the one performed at the end of Section 5.1.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where Λ− is defined in (24). We next follow a discussion similar to the one performed at the end of Section 5.1.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, it may be preferable in practice to create bases adapted to the operators ∇q, ∇ * q , ∇p and ∇ * q in order to simplify the algebra involved in the computation of the elements of the rigidity matrix. For these two reasons basis functions are rarely of mean 0 with respect to µ in the literature, see for instance [20,28,1] for recent examples. We therefore need to extend the results of Section 3 to the non-conformal case VM ⊂ L 2 0 (µ).…”
Section: Non-conformal Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…respectively scale as ∆t 3 and ∆t 3/2 (see Lemmas 3.1 and 3.5). We consider three kinds of ARkinetic energies: the original function interpolation (33), and two interpolation functions (34) (a) Comparison of the AR-kinetic energy functions (33) and (34).…”
Section: Average Rejection Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%