2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-017-0914-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error analysis of implicit Runge–Kutta methods for quasilinear hyperbolic evolution equations

Abstract: We establish error bounds of implicit Runge-Kutta methods for a class of quasilinear hyperbolic evolution equations including certain Maxwell and wave equations. Our assumptions cover algebraically stable and coercive schemes such as Gauß and Radau collocation methods. We work in a refinement of the analytical setting of Kato's well-posedness theory.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first show stability for implicit Runge-Kutta methods applied to the ODE system (7.5). The proof of the stability bound is a straightforward simplification of the corresponding results of (Mansour, 2015, Lemma 4.1), or (Hochbruck & Pažur, 2015, Section 3), (Hochbruck et al, 2018, Lemma 5.1-5.2), (Kovács & Lubich, 2018, where more general problems than (7.5) are considered.…”
Section: Convergence Of the Full Discretisation With Gauss-runge-kutt...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We first show stability for implicit Runge-Kutta methods applied to the ODE system (7.5). The proof of the stability bound is a straightforward simplification of the corresponding results of (Mansour, 2015, Lemma 4.1), or (Hochbruck & Pažur, 2015, Section 3), (Hochbruck et al, 2018, Lemma 5.1-5.2), (Kovács & Lubich, 2018, where more general problems than (7.5) are considered.…”
Section: Convergence Of the Full Discretisation With Gauss-runge-kutt...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some parts have already been covered in the literature, only the L 2 norm requires some simple modifications. We give these details, but for those parts which are not new we only give detailed references, following Mansour (2015); Hochbruck & Pažur (2015); Hochbruck et al (2018); Kovács & Lubich (2018). We strongly believe, and the previous references also strengthen, that these techniques extend to time discretisations of more general, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a final comment we note that the mathematical theory about Galerkin-in-time and/or full-tableau RK methods developed by the numerical PDE community; see [41,42,1,61,35,22] and references therein, rarely ever applies (or even mentions) DIRK schemes. We do however, highlight the preexistence of quite relevant material with specific focus on DIRK schemes that shares a few common points of intersection with the material presented in this manuscript.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its major drawback, however, is that it is only first order accurate. In order to remedy this issue, higher order generalizations, like Galerkin-in-time schemes, have been developed and analyzed; see for instance [41,42,1,61,35,60,22] and references therein. These schemes can also be shown to possess energy-balance laws, and are of arbitrary high order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one can actually also find approximation rates of the implicit and semi-implicit Euler method in there. By completely new techniques, these results could be improved to optimal order in [15] for equations of the type (1.1) and higher order Runge-Kutta methods were discussed in [14,21]. In the case of the onedimensional wave equation equipped with periodic boundary condition, error bounds for semi-discretization in time and full discretization were proved in [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%