1972
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-197210000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Analysis of Corneal Thickness Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the increase of CCT was mainly due to the increase in the stromal thickness. Although OCT measurement may be affected by the changes in corneal refractive index due to corneal edema after surgery, it has been suggested that potential errors of estimating the thickness induced by edema could be below 3.0% [26]. The possible error may not explain measured swelling of the cornea and DEC in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Thus, the increase of CCT was mainly due to the increase in the stromal thickness. Although OCT measurement may be affected by the changes in corneal refractive index due to corneal edema after surgery, it has been suggested that potential errors of estimating the thickness induced by edema could be below 3.0% [26]. The possible error may not explain measured swelling of the cornea and DEC in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Corrections for variation in horizontal corneal curvature have been made when appropriate, whereas no correction for variation in refractive index due to stromal swelling has been attempted. The importance of changes in refractive index in the study of corneal thickness was emphasized by Arner & Rengstorff (1972), who calculated a 3'O/o increase in apparent thickness if the corneal refractive index was reduced to that of water. Similarly, from the refractive index of dry cornea reported by Fischer (1930) (1.384) a 1 O/o decrease in apparent thickness could be accounted for.…”
Section: ' (X-x)'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since thickness is determined along the normal to the anterior surface, and a diffuse scattering of light from the posterior surface is viewed, knowledge of the radius of the posterior surface of the cornea is not necessary with this pachometer arrangement. This statement is contrary to the opinions of Maurice and Giardini (195 1) and Arner and Rengstorff (1972). The sagittal thickness, or minimum thickness (which is equivalent to the thickness along the normal to the posterior surface of the cornea) can be calculated from the measurements made with this arrangement, but the back surface radius must then be known.…”
Section: Exactmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Errors in the estimation of refractive index are of less importance (corneal hydration would need to alter by some 7-8 YO to produce a 1 % error in the estimate oft), whilst variation in the corneal radius of curvature between individuals can virtually be ignored. Further discussion on sources of error in pachometry measurements may be found in other references (Arner and Rengstorff, 1972;Fatt and Harris, 1973;Patel, 1981;Edmund and LaCour, 1986).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%