Error analysis for determination of accuracy of an ultrasound navigation system for head and neck surgery

Abstract

Objective: The use of conventional CT-or MRI-based navigation systems for head and neck surgery is unsatisfactory due to tissue shift. Moreover, changes occurring during surgical procedures cannot be visualized. To overcome these drawbacks, we developed a novel ultrasound-guided navigation system for head and neck surgery. A comprehensive error analysis was undertaken to determine the accuracy of this new system. Materials and Methods: The evaluation of the system accuracy was essentially based on the method of error definition for well-established fiducial marker registration methods (point-pair matching) as used in, for example, CT-or MRI-based navigation. This method was modified in accordance with the specific requirements of ultrasound-guided navigation. The Fiducial Localization Error (FLE), Fiducial Registration Error (FRE) and Target Registration Error (TRE) were determined. Results: In our navigation system, the real error (the TRE actually measured) did not exceed a volume of 1.58 mm 3 with a probability of 0.9. A mean value of 0.8 mm (standard deviation: 0.25 mm) was found for the FRE. The quality of the coordinate tracking system (Polaris localizer) could be defined with an FLE of 0.4 AE 0.11 mm (mean AE standard deviation). The quality of the coordinates of the crosshairs of the phantom was determined with a deviation of 0.5 mm (standard deviation: 0.07 mm).Conclusion: The results demonstrate that our newly developed ultrasound-guided navigation system shows only very small system deviations and therefore provides very accurate data for practical applications.

Errors according to the number of registered markers used in navigation-assisted surgery of the mandible

“…Many errors can arise during the overlaying of digital images using a computer [8, 19]. These errors include measurement errors that occur in the hardware and software of the CT equipment.…”