2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevstab.13.069901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Unique electron polarimeter analyzing power comparison and precision spin-based energy measurement [Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams7, 042802 (2004)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used polarized electron beams with currents up to I = 60 µA and energies of 359 and 684 MeV generated with a strained GaAs polarized source [16]. The average beam polarization, measured with Møller and Mott [17] polarimeters, was 85.8 ± 2.1(1.4)% at the lower (higher) incident energy. Helicity-correlated current changes were corrected with active feedback to about 0.3 parts-per-million (ppm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used polarized electron beams with currents up to I = 60 µA and energies of 359 and 684 MeV generated with a strained GaAs polarized source [16]. The average beam polarization, measured with Møller and Mott [17] polarimeters, was 85.8 ± 2.1(1.4)% at the lower (higher) incident energy. Helicity-correlated current changes were corrected with active feedback to about 0.3 parts-per-million (ppm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latest polarized electron source can provide up to 90% polarization. Beam polarization is usually measured after acceleration using a Møller polarimeter [28] each few days. To avoid any slow systematic drifts (like temperature sensitivity of the experimental setup, beam depolarization, etc...), helicity of the electron beam is reversed, at a frequency of few Hz using a randomly chosen pattern of helicity states.…”
Section: Experimental Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In extracted beams, Møller polarimetry typically has to use beam currents much lower than the PV experiments need. Extrapolation of the results to the experimental conditions introduces a systematic error, which is sometimes hard to evaluate, in particular in case of JLab where the beam in a certain hall may contain a leakage from a differently polarized beam for another hall [3]. Møller polarimetry with these targets is invasive and typically requires a different beam tuning.…”
Section: Møller Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "beams" may have different currents and polarizations. A small leakage from a differently polarized beam may introduce a considerable systematic error [3]. Variations of the electron polarization at the source is also a possibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%