2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.90.019902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Underground study of theO17(p,γ)18Freact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are in perfect agreement reducing considerably the systematics [39]. New results on the non resonant component and on the 183.3 keV resonance have been obtained (ωγ = (1.67 ± 0.12)µeV [39,40]) reducing the uncertainties of isotopes production in nova explosion models to a 10% level [40]. The very low uncertainty obtained in this experiment was possible thank to an intensive study of the target, realised and tested directly by the LUNA group with ion beam analysis and secondary induced mass spectroscopy techniques [41].…”
Section: The Other Cno Cyclessupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The results are in perfect agreement reducing considerably the systematics [39]. New results on the non resonant component and on the 183.3 keV resonance have been obtained (ωγ = (1.67 ± 0.12)µeV [39,40]) reducing the uncertainties of isotopes production in nova explosion models to a 10% level [40]. The very low uncertainty obtained in this experiment was possible thank to an intensive study of the target, realised and tested directly by the LUNA group with ion beam analysis and secondary induced mass spectroscopy techniques [41].…”
Section: The Other Cno Cyclessupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The reaction rate uncertainty attained is now below the required precision for nova models. We verified, following a full set of hydrodynamic nova models, that the abundances of oxygen and fluorine isotopes obtained with the present reaction rate are determined with 10% precision and put firmer constraints on observational signatures of novae events [8].…”
Section: Thementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The reaction has been measured in the energy range E cm = 160 − 370 keV and the resonance strength of the 183 keV resonance determined with unprecedented precision to be ω γ = (1.67 ± 0.12) μeV [7,8]. The contribution of Eugene Wigner in this field is very relevant, especially for what concerns the description of the resonance strength.…”
Section: Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the most recent results of Iliadis et al (2010) [21] and of Di Leva et al (2014) [28], the (p,α) and (p,γ) THM rates will be evaluated.…”
Section: B State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the E R =183 keV resonance, the weighted average values of the energies and strengths measured by [12,25,26] were adopted. For the higher energy resonances above E R =500 keV, the partial widths have been adopted from the R-matrix analysis (see Table 3 of [24] [27] and Di Leva et al (2014) [28]. In these studies, the reaction cross section has been measured directly in a wide energy range, E cm =200-370 keV, appropriate for hydrogen burning in classical novae.…”
Section: B State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%