2020
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2020.3020710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to “The HL-LHC Low-β Quadrupole Magnet MQXF: From Short Models to Long Prototypes” [Aug 19 Art. no. 4001309]

Abstract: Among the components to be upgraded in LHC interaction regions for the HiLumi-LHC projects are the inner triplet (or low-β) quadrupole magnets, denoted as Q1, Q2a, Q2b, and Q3. The new quadrupole magnets, called MQXF, are based on Nb3Sn superconducting magnet technology and operate at a gradient of 132.6 T/m with a conductor peak field of 11.4 T. The Q1 and Q3 are composed by magnets (called MQXFA) fabricated by the US Accelerator Upgrade Project (AUP) with a magnetic length of 4.2 m. The Q2a and Q2b consists … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By simulating the superconducting coil as a 60 sector with a uniform overall current density (jo = Icable/Ains_cable) it is possible to carry out a sensitivity analysis where the key magnet parameters are investigated, as show in [22]- [23]. The magnetic numerical model (implemented in ANSYS 2D) assumes a 0.67 ratio between jo and je (obtained by considering the Nb3Sn insulated cable for the MQXF project [24]) and a 250 mm thick iron yoke placed at 25 mm from the outer radius of the coil. In order to investigate the stress induced on the coil mid-plane by the azimuthal and radial electro-magnetic (e.m.) forces, the numerical mechanical model (implemented in ANSYS 2D) imposes an infinitely rigid structure all around the coil.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis With Sector Coilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By simulating the superconducting coil as a 60 sector with a uniform overall current density (jo = Icable/Ains_cable) it is possible to carry out a sensitivity analysis where the key magnet parameters are investigated, as show in [22]- [23]. The magnetic numerical model (implemented in ANSYS 2D) assumes a 0.67 ratio between jo and je (obtained by considering the Nb3Sn insulated cable for the MQXF project [24]) and a 250 mm thick iron yoke placed at 25 mm from the outer radius of the coil. In order to investigate the stress induced on the coil mid-plane by the azimuthal and radial electro-magnetic (e.m.) forces, the numerical mechanical model (implemented in ANSYS 2D) imposes an infinitely rigid structure all around the coil.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis With Sector Coilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of magnetic analysis, the strands diameters for both the Nb3Sn and HTS ranges from 0.85 to 1.15 mm, and the cable width from 13.3 mm to 24.4 mm. A cable compaction similar to the one of the MQXF cable [24] is assumed, again for both Nb3Sn and HTS cables. As for the sector coil analysis, a 250 mm thick iron is considered in the computations.…”
Section: Conceptual Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…masses (plus 2 spares), each featuring a single 7.15 m long magnet, called MQXFB with identical cross-section design as the US magnets [4], [5]. Since 2016, a total of six short models (MQXFS1, MQXFS3−7) and two long prototypes, for both the "A" magnets (MQXFAP1-2) and the "B" magnets (MQXFBP1-P2) have been fabricated and tested.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%