Erratum to: Spatio-temporal variation of Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation absorbed by vegetation in the Hengduan Mountains, China

Abstract

On Page 894, Fig. 1d is redundant in the original article and should be removed.On Page 895, in Section 2.2, the 4th paragraph, the figure number "Fig. 1d" in the last sentence is incorrect. It should be corrected into "Fig. 1c".On Page 896, in Section 3.2, the 1st paragraph, the figure number "Fig. 1d" in the 2nd sentence is incorrect. It should be corrected into "Fig. 1c".

Monitoring the Impact of Heat Damage on Summer Maize on the Huanghuaihai Plain, China

“…The canopy absorption of the photosynthetically active radiation ratio, FAPAR (fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation), can be used to describe the process of vegetation material and energy exchange and can indirectly reflect the status of vegetation or crops subjected to water and temperature stress [28][29][30]. There have been many published FAPAR inversion studies based on hyperspectral remote sensing [31][32][33], but thus far, comparative studies between various FAPAR inversion models are still lacking, and each model has different applicable scenarios. Therefore, to accurately monitor and analyze the high temperature and thermal damage of crops, choosing a suitable FAPAR inversion model and improving the accuracy of the existing inversion model are still important research directions in this field.…”