Erratum to “Solid-phase extraction-gas chromatography and solid-phase extraction-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry determination of corrosion inhibiting long-chain primary alkyl amines in chemical treatment of boiler water in water-steam systems of power plants” [J. Chromatogr. A 1113 (2006) 198–205]

Kusch, Peter; Knupp, Gerd; Hergarten, Marcus; Kozupa, M.; Majchrzak, Maria

doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2009.07.069

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Sample preparation techniques used for water analysis are based on liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) [6,7], solid-phase extraction (SPE) [8][9], solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [10][11][12][13] or, more recently, stir bar sorbent extraction (SBSE) [14][15][16] and other techniques involving a derivatization reaction [17][18][19]. After the sample preparation, the analytes of interest are usually determined by gas chromatography coupled to different detectors [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-determination of organic pollutants in water by gas chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry

Retamal

Costa

Suarez

et al. 2013

International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-determination of organic pollutants in water by gas chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry

Retamal

Costa

Suarez

et al. 2013

International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Aliphatic amines are an important group of compounds derived in nature by the degradation of organic matter such as proteins, amino acids, and other nitrogen‐containing compounds. They are also widely used as industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, polymers, dyestuffs, and corrosion inhibitors 1–5. Besides creating an unpleasant smell, these compounds are irritants of the skin, mucous membranes, eyes, and respiratory tract.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The derivatives formed require further extraction and concentration prior to GC or LC analysis. Several extraction techniques have been used to extract amines from aqueous samples such as liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) 1, 9, 18, solid‐phase extraction (SPE) 3, 6, 13, 19, single‐drop microextraction (SDME) 16, liquid‐phase microextraction (LPME) 15, and solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) 2, 7, 10, 11, 17, 20–25.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Automated on‐fiber derivatization with headspace SPME‐GC‐MS‐MS for the determination of primary amines in sewage sludge using pressurized hot water extraction

Llop

Pocurull

Borrull

2011

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An automated, environmentally friendly, simple, selective, and sensitive method was developed for the determination of ten primary aliphatic amines in sewage sludge at μg/kg dry weight (d.w.). The procedure involves a pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE) of the analytes from the solid matrix, followed by a fully automated on-fiber derivatization with 2,3,4,5-pentafluorobenzaldehyde (PFBAY) and headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and subsequent gas chromatography ion-trap tandem mass spectrometry (GC-IT-MS-MS) analysis. The limits of detection (LODs) of the method were between 0.5 and 45 μg/kg (d.w.) for all compounds except for ethyl-, isopropyl-, and amylamine, whose LODs were 70, 109, and 116 μg/kg (d.w.), respectively. The limits of quantification (LOQs) were between 10 and 350 μg/kg (d.w.). Repeatability and intermediate precision, expressed as RSD(%) (n=3), were lower than 18 and 21%, respectively. The method developed enabled to determine primary aliphatic amines in sludge from various urban and industrial sewage treatment plants as well as from a potable treatment plant. Most of the primary aliphatic amines were found in the sewage sludge samples analyzed corresponding to the maximum concentrations to the samples from the urban plant: for instance, isobutylamine and methylamine were found at 7728 and 12 536 μg/kg (d.w.), respectively. Amylamine was detected only in few samples but always at concentrations lower than its LOQ.

show abstract

“…When these samples are analyzed by GC with non‐selective detectors such as flame ionization (FID), many peaks with the same retention times as those of amines are often present in the chromatograms. Although GC analyses of water samples with selective detectors can save sample preparation, several clean‐up and preconcentration procedures as liquid–liquid extraction 15, SPE 16–18, solid‐phase microextraction 14, 19 and liquid‐phase microextraction 20 have been proposed to improve the sensitivity and selectivity of methodologies for GC determination of AAs and NAms.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The universal FID has the lack of sensitivity and specificity, and flame photometric detector and electron‐capture detector require derivatization prior to analysis. Furthermore, GC‐MS detection can provide structural information for the unequivocal identification of amines at sub‐nanogram quantities, which can be determined by MS‐based on the SIM 1, 3, 4, 14, 16, 18–20, 26. Packed and capillary chromatographic columns can be used to separate amines, but analytical chemists started to use capillaries for their separation in complex mixtures.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of stationary phases and gas chromatographic detectors for determination of amines in water

Jurado‐Sánchez

Ballesteros

Gallego

2010

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For the first time, a systematic overview deals with the advantages and disadvantages of several stationary phases (polar and non-polar) and gas chromatographic detectors (flame ionization detector, nitrogen-phosphorus detector and MS) for the determination of 27 amines (aliphatic and aromatic amines and N-nitrosamines) in water samples. To increase sensitivity (250 mL of sample was eluted with 150 μL of solvent) and matrix elimination, an automatic SPE system was employed prior to GC determination. The best results in terms of resolution and retention times were achieved using a column coated with 5% phenyl-dimethylpolysiloxane (DB-5). Capacity factor (k) values for the 27 amines increased with the rise in the polarity of the stationary phase, ranging from 3.0-27.7 and 2.2-14.4 for polar (polyethylene glycol) and non-polar (DB-5) columns, respectively. The detection limits of the method were 0.9-9 μg/L for flame ionization detector, 8-95 ng/L for nitrogen-phosphorus detector and 0.2-6.3 ng/L for MS. The precision was similar for the three detectors (RSD, 3.7-6.0%). The GC-MS method was applied with a high degree of accuracy and precision to determine amines in real samples including tap, river, pond, well, swimming pool and wastewaters.

show abstract

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Multi-determination of organic pollutants in water by gas chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry

Multi-determination of organic pollutants in water by gas chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry

Automated on‐fiber derivatization with headspace SPME‐GC‐MS‐MS for the determination of primary amines in sewage sludge using pressurized hot water extraction

Evaluation of stationary phases and gas chromatographic detectors for determination of amines in water

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About