2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23757-2_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to: Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components

Abstract: In the original version of the book, the belated corrections from author to modify the sentence in Sect. 3.7.3 of Chapter 3 and to update the equations in Tables 6.3 and 6.4 of Chapter 6 have been incorporated. An erratum chapters and the book have been updated with the changes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some hold that the extrapolated SCF is not affected by weld size, because the extrapolation region is far enough from the weld toe. This view is reflected in the SCF formula for pure CHS joints in Reference [6], which does not consider the impact of weld size. Some believe that the weld size has a certain effect on the SCF of the welded joint, as evidenced by the SCF formula in Reference [3].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some hold that the extrapolated SCF is not affected by weld size, because the extrapolation region is far enough from the weld toe. This view is reflected in the SCF formula for pure CHS joints in Reference [6], which does not consider the impact of weld size. Some believe that the weld size has a certain effect on the SCF of the welded joint, as evidenced by the SCF formula in Reference [3].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, various methods have been developed to evaluate the fatigue performance of steel tube joints. Among them, hot spot stress stands out as the most popular and successful strategy for fatigue calculated of welded tube joints [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Nevertheless, there is not yet a consensus on the effects of weld size on hot spot stress in the calculation of fatigue performance of the joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variety in the environmental factors causes to use the different fatigue assessment approaches in order to predict more accurately the fatigue lifetime of the welded structural system. Therefore, the different fatigue lifetime determination methods have been taken their places in the national or international design codes, for example, International Institution of Welding (IIW) (Hobbacher, 2019), Japanese (Japanese Society of Steel Construction (JSSC) 2012), British (BSI 1993) and Eurocode 3 (UNI EN 2005), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows it for greater discontinuities in areas subjected to small stress which saves resources without compromising the safety of the structure. From another perspective, Hobbacher [4] establishes a basis for the design and analysis of welded joints whose stress can be considered fluctuating to avoid fatigue failures. The evaluation procedures determine the information related to the action and fatigue resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%