1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf03259129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to Pantoprazole: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

9
109
0
15

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
109
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Novel antipsychotic compounds (second-generation or 'atypical' antipsychotics) such as clozapine (Fitton and Heel, 1990), olanzapine (Fulton and Goa, 1997), and sertindole (Kane and Tamminga, 1997;Azorin et al, 2006) have some beneficial effect on negative symptoms and reduced potential to produce extrapyramidal side effects, but these agents have demonstrated inconsistent effects on cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. Depending on the type of cognitive domain measured, second-generation antipsychotics have been reported to produce improvement (Mortimer 1997;Meltzer and McGurk, 1999;Keefe et al, 2007), no effect (Hoff et al, 1996;Meltzer and McGurk, 1999), and impairment (Goldberg et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel antipsychotic compounds (second-generation or 'atypical' antipsychotics) such as clozapine (Fitton and Heel, 1990), olanzapine (Fulton and Goa, 1997), and sertindole (Kane and Tamminga, 1997;Azorin et al, 2006) have some beneficial effect on negative symptoms and reduced potential to produce extrapyramidal side effects, but these agents have demonstrated inconsistent effects on cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia. Depending on the type of cognitive domain measured, second-generation antipsychotics have been reported to produce improvement (Mortimer 1997;Meltzer and McGurk, 1999;Keefe et al, 2007), no effect (Hoff et al, 1996;Meltzer and McGurk, 1999), and impairment (Goldberg et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Diarrhoea was one of the most common adverse events reported in clinical trials with proton pump inhibitors, namely in 3.5% of patients using 30 mg lansoprazole, 1.9% using 20 to 40 mg omeprazole, 1.5% using 40 to 120 mg of pantoprazole and 2.4% using 10 to 20 mg rabeprazole. [1][2][3][4] In patients with an age of 65 years or more, a frequency of diarrhoea of 4.7% is documented. 1 During long-term treatment, diarrhoea occurred in 1.9 to 5% of lansoprazole users compared to 3% of omeprazole users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pantoprazole has several advantages compared to its analogues (e.g., omeprazole and lansoprazole) such as specific site of binding, greater stability in neutral pH environment, and longer duration of action 6 . Besides, it presents no potential to induce or inhibit the CYP 450 1,2,7 . It is a more selective inhibitor of acid secretion than other proton pump inhibitors 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%