2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2003.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to “Observation of long ionizing tracks with the ICARUS T600 first half-module” [Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 508 (2003) 287–294]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the resolution smearing is not considered in the GRESP Monte Carlo code. We considered the resolution smearing similar to the way described in Ref [9]. The "realistic " Monte Carlo spectrum can be obtained from the convolution of the simulation spectrum with the system response function,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the resolution smearing is not considered in the GRESP Monte Carlo code. We considered the resolution smearing similar to the way described in Ref [9]. The "realistic " Monte Carlo spectrum can be obtained from the convolution of the simulation spectrum with the system response function,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below the analysis range (corresponding to ∼ 7 − 9 keVnr), the scintillation yield is indicated as dashed lines. Also shown are previous published measurements using mono-energetic neutron beams: ( ) [10], (∎) [11], (▲) [25], ( ) [26], (△) [27], (▽) [28] and ( ) [21], or obtained using a similar Monte Carlo matching procedure (▼) [7].…”
Section: Detector Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of zero field, the observed light yield is usually interpreted as a relative scintillation efficiency with respect to a known gamma-ray energy, such as 122 keV from 57 Co calibration source [8,10,17]. The available data from various experiments [29,30,31,32,33,34] shows a rather broad distribution, which deserves a good physics model to justify the observed data points. The observed relative scintillation efficiency can be explained by three physics functions: the variation of the W i -value, quenching factors, and recombination.…”
Section: Direct Excitation Ionizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. The free parameters α and β are obtained by normalizing the scintillation efficiency from the generic model (Eq.10) to the available data for ERs [16,75], and NRs [25,29,30,31,32,33,34]. The functions describing the volume recombination time are found to be:…”
Section: Volume Recombination Time For Zero Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%