The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep12(2020)042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to: NNLO QCD corrections to jet production in deep inelastic scattering

Abstract: We correct an error in the implementation of specific integrated initial-final antenna functions that impact the numerical predictions for the DIS process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ZEUS data are very well compatible with the corresponding measurement from the H1 collaboration [4], which is also shown in the figure. Both measurements show similar trends relative to the NNLO QCD predictions, as calculated by the NNLOJet program [5]. Within the combined uncertainty the NNLO QCD predictions agree well with the measured cross sections.…”
Section: Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The ZEUS data are very well compatible with the corresponding measurement from the H1 collaboration [4], which is also shown in the figure. Both measurements show similar trends relative to the NNLO QCD predictions, as calculated by the NNLOJet program [5]. Within the combined uncertainty the NNLO QCD predictions agree well with the measured cross sections.…”
Section: Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The z-integration of the resulting expressions recovers the known real-virtual initialfinal master integrals [45] and enabled us to identify an error in their numerical implementation for jet production in deep-inelastic scattering [51].…”
Section: Jhep04(2022)031mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…All these processes are essential to pin down the accuracy of the parton distribution functions in the region of a clear twist-2 dominance [236], also accounting for jet production cross sections in pp → Z+jet at NNLO [237,238] and in ep two-jet production [239].…”
Section: Precision Goals In Testing the Standard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%