2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.05.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to “Neutron–19C scattering: Emergence of universal properties in a finite range potential” [Phys. Lett. B 764 (2017) 196]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
15
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As this observable is expected to be quite sensible to the range, we found also appropriate to further discuss here some relevant results related to range effects and corresponding scaling reported in Ref. [11]. We have noticed that the scaling of the position of the pole in k cot δ R 0 and the effective range parameters reproduces universal characteristics already found within the zero-range model under the realm of the Efimov physics.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As this observable is expected to be quite sensible to the range, we found also appropriate to further discuss here some relevant results related to range effects and corresponding scaling reported in Ref. [11]. We have noticed that the scaling of the position of the pole in k cot δ R 0 and the effective range parameters reproduces universal characteristics already found within the zero-range model under the realm of the Efimov physics.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…It remains the question how much such universal features are preserved when using finite-range potentials, considering the range of the n − c and n − n interactions, when the two-neutron separation energy in 20 C is kept fixed. Therefore, in a recent work [11], we have performed a deeper investigation on the behavior of the low-energy pole k cot δ 0 for the n− 19 C scattering, beyond the zero-range approach used in Ref. [12], by considering a finite-range potential, which was chosen separable with Yamaguchi form.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the formalism, following Ref. [42], we assume units such that = 1 (with energies given in mK), with m ≡ m α = m4 He and a mass ratio which is defined by A ≡ m β /m α , such that µ αα = m/2 and µ αβ = Am/(A + 1) are the reduced masses for the αα and αβ subsystems, respectively, with the corresponding three-body reduced masses given by µ α(αβ) = m(A + 1)/(A + 2) for the α − (αβ); and µ β(αα) = m(2A)/(A + 2) for the β − (αα). The bound-state energies for the two-and three-body systems are given by E αα ≡ −B αα , E αβ ≡ −B αβ and E 3 = −B 3 , respectively; with the energy of the s−wave elastic colliding particle given by E k .…”
Section: Faddeev Three-body Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%