2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to “Modified two-body potential approach to the peripheral direct capture astrophysical a+AB+γ reaction and asymptotic normalization coefficients” [Nucl. Phys. A 781 (2007) 247]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the uncertainty found from an analysis of our data for the value of the asymptotic normalization coefficient may be underestimated. In view of this, we additionally tested the correctness of the value of the asymptotic normalization coefficient for the reaction p + 14 N → 15 O(6.793 MeV; 3/2 − ) by analyzing experimental astrophysical S factors for the reaction 14 N(p, γ) 15 O(6.793 MeV; 3/2 − ) [6], which are highly accurate in the off-resonance energy region, relying on the modified two-particle potential approach [37] 1) Here, we take the opportunity to note that there is a misprint in [23]: the phase factor e 2i(w l i −δ l i ) is missing in the integrand in (13) for the direct-radiative-capture amplitude in front of the function O l i (r). and assuming that, in this energy region, radiative proton capture by a 14 N nucleus is direct.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Reaction 14 N(p γ) 15 O Within The R-matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the uncertainty found from an analysis of our data for the value of the asymptotic normalization coefficient may be underestimated. In view of this, we additionally tested the correctness of the value of the asymptotic normalization coefficient for the reaction p + 14 N → 15 O(6.793 MeV; 3/2 − ) by analyzing experimental astrophysical S factors for the reaction 14 N(p, γ) 15 O(6.793 MeV; 3/2 − ) [6], which are highly accurate in the off-resonance energy region, relying on the modified two-particle potential approach [37] 1) Here, we take the opportunity to note that there is a misprint in [23]: the phase factor e 2i(w l i −δ l i ) is missing in the integrand in (13) for the direct-radiative-capture amplitude in front of the function O l i (r). and assuming that, in this energy region, radiative proton capture by a 14 N nucleus is direct.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Reaction 14 N(p γ) 15 O Within The R-matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5], respectively, if the comments made in Ref. [5] are taken into account. The normalization for the partial amplitude (22) differs from that chosen in Ref.…”
Section: Effective-range Expansion and Nuclear Vertex Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,18,19] is taken into account. First, a single free parameter, the scattering length a lj , is adjusted by averaging its value obtained from Eqs.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations