2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2006.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to “Linking the collisional history of the main asteroid belt to its dynamical excitation and depletion” [Icarus 179 (2005) 63–94]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
153
1
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
153
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This result probably implies that the disrupted body was small, perhaps only several kilometers across, such that the largest fragments produced by the breakup have sizes below the current detection limit. According to Bottke et al (2005), a 1 km diameter asteroid disrupts in the main belt every $100 yr and a 10 km diameter asteroid every $100 kyr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result probably implies that the disrupted body was small, perhaps only several kilometers across, such that the largest fragments produced by the breakup have sizes below the current detection limit. According to Bottke et al (2005), a 1 km diameter asteroid disrupts in the main belt every $100 yr and a 10 km diameter asteroid every $100 kyr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is an approximate size d disrupt of a projectile necessary to disrupt the parent body of the Schubart family? Using from Bottke et al (2005): and substituting Q * D = 10 5 J kg −1 for the strength (somewhat lower than that of basaltic objects to accommodate the assumed C/X spectral type; e.g. Kenyon et al 2008 and references therein), V imp = 4.78 km s −1 for the typical impact velocity (see Dahlgren 1998) and D target ≃ 130 km, we obtain d disrupt ≃ 25 km.…”
Section: Collisional Families Among Hilda Asteroidsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Current observational estimates on the number of NEAs with diameter of the order of 10 m range from 10 7 to about 5 × 10 7 (Brown et al 2002; Ivanov et al 2002; Bottke et al 2005). Suppose that only 5–10 per cent of these are on low‐eccentricity orbits (Rabinowitz 1994), then we have about 10 5 such objects.…”
Section: Originmentioning
confidence: 99%