Implementing Communities of Practice in Higher Education 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-2866-3_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to: Implementing Communities of Practice in Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These communities share new knowledge, experiences, and resources, which enhance all community members' capabilities. This form of ongoing learning requires engagement within and between members to develop knowledge that, over time, transforms learning and practice within larger systems (McDonald & Cater-Steel, 2016 ). This student-centered learning allows for meta-cognition that is transferable to other spaces, and when used in social media assignments, has been found to increase student familiarity with new tools and a sense of competency (Blaschke, 2014 ).…”
Section: Heutagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These communities share new knowledge, experiences, and resources, which enhance all community members' capabilities. This form of ongoing learning requires engagement within and between members to develop knowledge that, over time, transforms learning and practice within larger systems (McDonald & Cater-Steel, 2016 ). This student-centered learning allows for meta-cognition that is transferable to other spaces, and when used in social media assignments, has been found to increase student familiarity with new tools and a sense of competency (Blaschke, 2014 ).…”
Section: Heutagogymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge management requires a process and knowledge management tool. Much research work in the past proposed knowledge management through various processes and tools such as storage of knowledge in a database, big data-based knowledge management (Sumbal et al, 2021), ontology-based knowledge management (Osman et al, 2022), after action reviews (Vukanović-Dumanović et al, 2022;Keiser & Arthur Jr, 2021), mentoring system (Papadopoulou et al, 2016;Bencsik et al, 2014;Srivichai et al, 2012), cross-functional team (Mohamed et al, 2004;Majchrzak et al, 2012), workshop and brainstorming (White et al, 2022;Evans, 2012), and communities http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter of practice (Arthur, 2016;Reaburn & McDonald, 2017;Lewis & Rush, 2013;Annala & Mäkinen, 2017;McDonald & Cater-Steel, 2016). Very few works use storytelling for knowledge management.…”
Section: The Knowledge Management In Classroom Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much debate on CoPs to support learning and socialization of novices continues in the field of education, including schooling, vocational, and workplace education, where the notion of CoPs originated-initially, CoPs was a learning, rather than a management theory (Wenger, 2010). For example, the books by educationalist authors such as Barton andTusting (2005) and McDonald and Cater-Steel (2017) include chapters that problematize the notions of power, language and conflict in CoPs in a non-corporate setting. Many authors consider that CoPs would benefit vocational learning.…”
Section: The Debate On Cops In Education and Workplace Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%