2019
DOI: 10.1515/mathm-2019-0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to “Hierarchizing graph-based image segmentation algorithms relying on region dissimilarity: the case of the Felzenszwalb-Huttenlocher method”

Abstract: The original version of the article was published in Mathematical Morphology - Theory and Applications 2 (2017) 55–75. Unfortunately, the original version contains a mistake: in the definition of Dif (C1, C2) in Section 3.6, max should be replaced by min. In this erratum we correct the formula defining Dif (C1, C2).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Before explaining HGB method, we¯rst describe the following observation scale dissimilarity de¯ned in Ref. 13, which is required by the method and whose idea originates from the region merging criterion proposed in Ref. 8.…”
Section: Hierarchical Graph-based Segmentation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Before explaining HGB method, we¯rst describe the following observation scale dissimilarity de¯ned in Ref. 13, which is required by the method and whose idea originates from the region merging criterion proposed in Ref. 8.…”
Section: Hierarchical Graph-based Segmentation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 On the other hand, the hierarchical method cannot provide simultaneously both of similar properties that are extended to hierarchies. 13 However, the later method allows us to¯nd maximal not-too-coarse hierarchies (see Ref. 13 for more details).…”
Section: Methods 1 Hgb Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations