2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2010.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to “Evolution of chirality from γ soft 108Ru to triaxial 110,112Ru” [Phys. Lett. B 670 (4–5) (2009) 307]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the π + π − KLOE data set, collected at Frascati using the ISR method and reanalyzed recently [42], has been considered.…”
Section: Sketching the Global Fit To Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the π + π − KLOE data set, collected at Frascati using the ISR method and reanalyzed recently [42], has been considered.…”
Section: Sketching the Global Fit To Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Examine the effect of the π + π − KLOE data [42] separately, because the fit properties of this sample are not fully satisfactory.…”
Section: Improved Estimate Of the Photon Hvpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the appearance of the ϕand Bfactories (detectors KLOE, BABAR, BELLE), a new approach, ISR, was developed [7], in which the data are taken at constant beam energy and the cross section e + e − → hadrons is extracted from the spectrum of e + e − → hadrons + γ events. The high precision measurement of e + e − → π + π − was performed at KLOE [8] and BABAR [9]; many other modes were measured at BABAR [10]. Here we discuss the energy scan-based measurements of R(s) at VEPP-2M and VEPP-2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 73% contribution arises from this process alone which is the leading contributor to the uncertainty of the theoretical prediction for a μ . Comparison of the theoretical and measured [1] values of a μ shows a discrepancy of about 3σ when current e + e − data [2][3][4] are used, possibly hinting at new physics. An approach using τ decay data corrected for isospin-breaking, leads to a smaller difference [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%