2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0098-1354(03)00005-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to “Dynamic optimization of batch processes II. Role of measurements in handling uncertainty”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
206
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
206
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the above static optimization problem, the constraint and the sensitivity parts of the NCO are given by (Srinivasan et al, 2003):…”
Section: Measurement-based Run-to-run Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the above static optimization problem, the constraint and the sensitivity parts of the NCO are given by (Srinivasan et al, 2003):…”
Section: Measurement-based Run-to-run Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility of reducing this conservatism consists of using measurements to improve the performance of the real process. This can be accomplished via model refinement and re-optimization (explicit optimization) (Eaton et al, 1990) or by adapting the inputs directly (implicit optimization) (Srinivasan et al, 2003). This paper considers the use of measurements for optimization via the tracking of the necessary conditions of optimality (NCO) (Srinivasan et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The standard approach in the presence of uncertainties is to implement a conservative open-loop strategy that leads to feasible but sub-optimal operation. However, the measurements available during the batch or at batch end could be used to improve the performance by reducing this conservatism (Srinivasan et al, 2003a). Depending on how these measurements are used, two methodologies can be distinguished:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%