2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10266-014-0193-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to: Cutting efficiency of nickel–titanium rotary and reciprocating instruments after prolonged use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adaptive motion and continuous rotation have similar cutting ability. [21] This might be an explanation for the results of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Adaptive motion and continuous rotation have similar cutting ability. [21] This might be an explanation for the results of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Different from traditional NiTi instruments processed and formed in the A style, Wave One and Reciproc files are processed and formed in the M style. The 3-mm tip has a larger taper and the upper taper is smaller, which enhances metal elasticity and fatigue resistance (2). Besides this, different from the continuous rotation movement in 360 degrees of traditional NiTi instruments, the reciprocating motion in which the clockwise rotation angle is more significant than the counterclockwise rotation enhances the fatigue resistance of the metal, reducing the risk of breaking during working, and also leads the file to the tooth's apex (14,15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, hand tools such as the H file are used to remove gutta-percha. Further developments include the mechanical Mtwo R and Reciproc files, nickeltitanium (NiTi) endodontic instruments used for singlefile root canal preparation (2,3). The Mtwo R files were designed for gutta-percha removal (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%