2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum to Chromosome differentiation patterns during cichlid fish evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We joined 370 loci in 22 linkage groups (Malawi cichlids have 22 haploid chromosomes) (16). The dataset exhibits nearly complete genotypes across 382 F 2 (0.4% missing data).…”
Section: Common Regions Of the Cichlid Genome Contribute To A Positivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We joined 370 loci in 22 linkage groups (Malawi cichlids have 22 haploid chromosomes) (16). The dataset exhibits nearly complete genotypes across 382 F 2 (0.4% missing data).…”
Section: Common Regions Of the Cichlid Genome Contribute To A Positivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences may reflect structural rearrangements, such as inversions and/or translocations, or may be due to the condensation or reorganization of the chromosomes, as proposed by the respective authors. Similar karyotype formulae have also been found in most other geophagin genera, such as Geophagus brasiliensis (6sm + 42st, Vicari et al, 2006;4sm + 44st, Pires et al, 2010), Biotodoma cupido (4m-sm + 44st-a) and Satanoperca jurupari (4m-sm + 44st-a) (Poletto et al, 2010a). In Apistogramma borellii, however, Poletto et al (2010a) recorded a quite different arrangement (16m-sm + 30st-a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…2n = diploid number; m = metacentric; sm = submetacentric; st = subtelocentric; a = acrocentric; p = short arm; q = long arm; t = terminal position; i = interstitial position; c = centromeric position; chr = chromosomes. References: (1) Nakajima et al (2012); (2) Paiz et al (2014); (3) Perazzo et al (2011); (4) Poletto et al (2010a); (5) Poletto et al (2010b); (6) Schneider et al (2013); (7) Vicari et al (2006). Classification used follows Smith et al (2008 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The genus Cichla has been used for phylogenetic and population structure studies (Oliveira et al 2006, Willis et al 2007 since it is one of the most basal (Poletto and Ferreira 2010) which forms a monophyletic group when compared to other Neotropical cichlids (López-Fernández et al 2010). The body shape is a characteristic in Cichla and species are identified mainly on coloration (Kullander and Ferreira 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%