2023
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “The Thermal Sunyaev–Zel’dovich Effect from Massive, Quiescent 0.5 ≤ z ≤ 1.5 Galaxies” (2021, ApJ, 913, 88)

Abstract: We have become aware of a small typo that could potentially cause misinterpretation for readers. The y-axis units in the plots of Figure 5 were incorrectly labeled as being in kilojansky (kJy), when in fact they are actually in millijansky (mJy). A corrected version is shown in Figure 5 below. The original data presented in Table 2, which these plots show via a conversion using Equation (4), are not affected and are still accurate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the EAZY redshifts as input to a custom IDL SED fitting code that was also recently used by Meinke et al (2021Meinke et al ( , 2023. This code starts with Bruzual & Charlot (2003, hereafter BC03) SED models assuming a Salpeter initial mass function (IMF) and an exponentially decaying star formation history specified by the decay scale, τ, which ranges from 0.01 to 100 Gyr in 16 logarithmically spaced steps.…”
Section: Photometric Redshift Estimation and Sed Fitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the EAZY redshifts as input to a custom IDL SED fitting code that was also recently used by Meinke et al (2021Meinke et al ( , 2023. This code starts with Bruzual & Charlot (2003, hereafter BC03) SED models assuming a Salpeter initial mass function (IMF) and an exponentially decaying star formation history specified by the decay scale, τ, which ranges from 0.01 to 100 Gyr in 16 logarithmically spaced steps.…”
Section: Photometric Redshift Estimation and Sed Fitsmentioning
confidence: 99%