2005
DOI: 10.1086/426055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “The Far‐ and Mid‐Infrared/Radio Correlations in the Spitzer Extragalactic First Look Survey” (ApJS, 154, 147 [2004])

Abstract: In the original paper, both axes of Figure 1a show units that are a factor of 1000 times too large. The corrected version is shown here. Fig. 1.-(a) 20 cm radio and 70 m IR luminosity correlation (see text) for the FLS long-wavelength sample and the distribution of monochromatic q 70 -values with redshift (b) uncorrected and (c) k-corrected using the DH01 SED-fitting method described in the text for the IR flux densities and assuming a (1 þ z) 0:7 k-corrected (boosting) of the 1.4 GHz values.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

54
258
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(318 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
54
258
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the small wavelength difference, this is plainly consistent with the values of q 24 derived by Appleton et al (2004).…”
Section: Determining K-corrected Values Of Q For Theĝ Subsamplesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the small wavelength difference, this is plainly consistent with the values of q 24 derived by Appleton et al (2004).…”
Section: Determining K-corrected Values Of Q For Theĝ Subsamplesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Following Appleton et al (2004) I define q 22 = log(S 22 μ /S 20 cm ) where S 22 μ and S 20 cm are the source flux densities measured by WISE and NVSS at wavelengths of 22 μm (WISE band 4) and 20 cm. Since the majority of the source samples are typically located in the local universe, the values of q 22 derived are relatively insensitive to any reasonable k-correction.…”
Section: Determining K-corrected Values Of Q For Theĝ Subsamplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 12 shows the relationship between 1.4 GHz radio flux and WISE mid-IR apparent magnitudes. At both 12 and 22 μm, we find a correlation similar to the radio-FIR (see also Appleton et al 2004). We compute the radio-MIR regression coefficients using Kaplan-Meier method so as to consider the upper limits in the radio during the fit.…”
Section: Radio-mir Flux Correlationmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In terms of the MIR flux, the slope of the radio-12 μm and radio-22 μm relation is ∼0.8 and 0.75, respectively, which is comparable to the slope obtained in previous studies of radio-MIR (Gruppioni et al 2003) and radio-FIR relation (which is ∼0.9). Unlike the tight radio-FIR correlation, the radio-MIR relation has a high dispersion (Appleton et al 2004), possibly because the 12 m m emission is not solely due to the dust heated by young stars, but can arise from the PAHs heated by young/evolved stars/AGNs or from the dust shells of the AGB population.…”
Section: Radio-mir Flux Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%