2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.103.159903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Stellar and Primordial Nucleosynthesis ofBe7: Measurement ofHe3(α,<

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
198
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
17
198
1
Order By: Relevance
“…∼700-2800 keV by using the activation method. Three data points obtained with low statistical error contribution [15] particularly show a good agreement with the ERNA data [11] and disagree with those from Parker et al [10]. A good agreement of our results and those from the ERNA collaboration is also seen when comparing with the recent measurements obtained by the ATOMKI collaboration using the activation technique [16].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…∼700-2800 keV by using the activation method. Three data points obtained with low statistical error contribution [15] particularly show a good agreement with the ERNA data [11] and disagree with those from Parker et al [10]. A good agreement of our results and those from the ERNA collaboration is also seen when comparing with the recent measurements obtained by the ATOMKI collaboration using the activation technique [16].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The brown filled circle shows the value obtained using the activation technique at TRIUMF. The S factors from Parker et al [10] and LUNA [22,23], ERNA [11], ATOMKI [16], Weizmann [21], Notre Dame [24] and Seattle [25] collaborations are also shown for comparison.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A revision of this reaction rate therefore looks mandatory for minimizing the uncertainty on the 19 F nucleosynthesis related to this nuclear process. We will clarify this issue in the near future, when we directly measure the strength of the 364 keV resonance and the intensity of the DC component using the ERNA recoil separator (Schürmann et al 2005;di Leva et al 2009;Di Leva et al 2012). …”
Section: Exploration Above Current Experimental Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our precise results clearly rule out the 3 He( 4 He,) 7 Be cross section as a possible source of the discrepancy between the predicted primordial 7 Li abundance and its much lower observed value. The LUNA results and few other high precision measurements [27,28,29] were included in the recent compilation "Solar fusion II" [30] to derive the best astrophysical S-factor for the 3 He( 4 He,) 7 Be reaction. The value obtained allows for a uncertainty reduction in the solar neutrino fluxes from 7.5% to 4.3% in the case of 8 B and from 8% to 4.5% in the case of 7 Be [31].…”
Section: Be Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%