Erratum: Relations between matrix elements of different weak interactions and interpretation of the parity-nonconserving and electron electric-dipole-moment measurements in atoms and molecules [Phys. Rev. A<b>84</b>, 052108 (2011)]

Dzuba, V. A.; Flambaum, V. V.; Harabati, C.

doi:10.1103/physreva.85.029901

Cited by 39 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We note, as pointed out in Ref. [13], that while there is a significant range of α de and α C S from different authors, there is much less dispersion in the ratio α C S /α de as reflected in Table IV. In Figure 1, we plot d e as a function of C S using experimental results for d TABLE IV: Sensitivity to de and CS and the ratio αC S /α de for observables in paramagnetic systems based on atomic theory calculations.…”

Section: B Paramagnetic Systems: Limits On De and Csmentioning

confidence: 82%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Electric dipole moments: A global analysis

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We perform a global analysis of searches for the permanent electric dipole moments (EDMs) of the neutron, neutral atoms, and molecules in terms of six leptonic, semileptonic, and nonleptonic interactions involving photons, electrons, pions, and nucleons. Translating the results into fundamental CP-violating effective interactions through dimension six involving Standard Model particles, we obtain rough lower bounds on the scale of beyond the Standard Model CP-violating interactions ranging from 1.5 TeV for the electron EDM to 1300 TeV for the nuclear spin-independent electronquark interaction. We show that future measurements involving systems or combinations of systems with complementary sensitivities to the low-energy parameters may extend the mass reach by an order of magnitude or more.

show abstract

Section: B Paramagnetic Systems: Limits On De and Csmentioning

confidence: 82%

“…[13] and recalling that the experimental result is reported as a limit on the electron EDM, we can define an effective electron EDM entering paramagnetic systems as…”

Section: B Paramagnetic Systems: Limits On De and Csmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electric dipole moments: A global analysis

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ratios R 1 , R 2 are much less sensitive to numerical uncertainties than each of the SD and SI PNC amplitudes [19].…”

Section: General Formalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Here we use (19) for the expansion. The results for M1 amplitudes obtained with the use of these formulas are presented in Table V together with the values from Ref.…”

Section: A M1 Amplitudesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Calculation of parity nonconservation in xenon and mercury

Dzuba¹,

Flambaum²

2012

Phys. Rev. A

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We use configuration interaction technique to calculate parity non-conservation (PNC) in metastable Xe and Hg [proposal of the experiment in L. Bougas et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 210801 (2012)]. Both, nuclear spin-independent and nuclear spin-dependent (dominated by the nuclear anapole moment) parts of the amplitude are considered. The amplitudes are strongly enhanced by proximity of the states of opposite parity.

show abstract

“…Atomic PNC measurements provide a unique test of the electroweak interaction in a regime that is complementary to high-energy accelerator techniques and place constraints on new physics beyond the Standard Model [12,13]. The interpretation of atomic PNC experiments requires accurate atomic structure calculations, such as the evaluation of radial matrix elements [14], which rely critically on the accuracy of the electronic wave functions. Experimentally determined matrix elements, along with other parameters such as excitation energies and hyperfine splittings, can be compared to theoretically calculated values to test the validity of the underlying theory.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lifetime measurement of the cesium6P3/2level using ultrafast pump-probe laser pulses

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using the inherent timing stability of pulses from a mode-locked laser, we have precisely measured the cesium 6P 3/2 excited state lifetime. An initial pump pulse excites cesium atoms in two counterpropagating atomic beams to the 6P 3/2 level. A subsequent synchronized probe pulse ionizes atoms which remain in the excited state, and the photo-ions are collected and counted. By selecting pump pulses which vary in time with respect to the probe pulses, we obtain a sampling of the excited state population in time, resulting in a lifetime value of 30.462(46) ns. The measurement uncertainty (0.15%) is slightly larger than our previous report of 0.12% [Phys. Rev. A 84, 010501(R) (2011)] due to the inclusion of additional data and systematic errors. In this follow-up paper we present details of the primary systematic errors encountered in the measurement, which include atomic motion within the intensity profiles of the laser beams, quantum beating in the photo-ion signal, and radiation trapping. Improvements to further reduce the experimental uncertainty are also discussed.

show abstract

Erratum: Relations between matrix elements of different weak interactions and interpretation of the parity-nonconserving and electron electric-dipole-moment measurements in atoms and molecules [Phys. Rev. A84, 052108 (2011)]

Cited by 39 publications

References 0 publications

Electric dipole moments: A global analysis

Electric dipole moments: A global analysis

Calculation of parity nonconservation in xenon and mercury

Lifetime measurement of the cesium6P3/2level using ultrafast pump-probe laser pulses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About