2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.87.239903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Properties of constraint-based single-point approximate kinetic energy functionals [Phys. Rev. B80, 245120 (2009)]

Abstract: Erratum: Properties of constraint-based single-point approximate kinetic energy functionals [Phys. Rev. B 80, 245120 (2009)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One result has been the emergence of active research on orbital-free DFT (OFDFT), that is, approximate functionals for the ingredients of the KS free energy, namely the KS kinetic energy (KE) T s , entropy S s , and XC free energy F xc or their ground-state counterparts. Almost all of this effort has been for ground-state OFKE functionals [43][44][45][46] . (Note that most of the OFKE literature invokes the KS separation of the KE in order to use existing E xc approximations consistently.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One result has been the emergence of active research on orbital-free DFT (OFDFT), that is, approximate functionals for the ingredients of the KS free energy, namely the KS kinetic energy (KE) T s , entropy S s , and XC free energy F xc or their ground-state counterparts. Almost all of this effort has been for ground-state OFKE functionals [43][44][45][46] . (Note that most of the OFKE literature invokes the KS separation of the KE in order to use existing E xc approximations consistently.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P92 20 and E00 21 tested by X-C) and our GGAs (VT84F, PBE2) is that the former do not predict binding in small molecules at all, while the latter do predict semi-quantitatively correct binding in those molecules and simple solids 6,17,18 . This categorical distinction and the broad utility of these GGAs is suggestive of having achieved a universal functional (though certainly not a proof).…”
Section: And References Therein X-c's Numerical Exploration Of G([n]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(For reference, the calculated equi- X-C also note that the near-nucleus density from PBE2 is peculiar. This is almost inevitable with any properly positive-definite GGA 17 . A singularity at the origin in the Pauli potential causes the artifact.…”
Section: And References Therein X-c's Numerical Exploration Of G([n]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[126]. At the nuclear cusp of any atom the reduced gradient is quite small (s<0:4), so that all the common GGA exchange enhancement factors behave as F x % 11ls 2 , to satisfy some gradient expansion: thus L % 2ql which diverges at the nuclear cusp as q, see Section 2.1, instead of being finite.…”
Section: Nuclear Cusp Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, modeling s KS using density ingredients only (i.e., s and q) is a very difficult problem [60,126] because of its strong nonlocality even for light atoms. [129] In fact, s KS has been evaluated as a functional of the density using a machine-learning technique with about one hundred thousands empirical parameters, for onedimensional systems, [130,131] as well as for real molecules.…”
Section: The Positive-defined Ks Kinetic Energy Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%