1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.59.2461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Occupied and unoccupied electronic band structure ofWSe2[Phys. Rev. B55, 10 400 (1997)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computed band gaps, IPs, and EAs are reported in Table . These are in good agreement with previous estimations and with experimental values. The IP is used to align the band structure of both materials against the vacuum level, providing a first estimation of the band discontinuity at the interface. Figure a and b reveal a staggered gap (type II heterojunction) at the WS 2 /WSe 2 interface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The computed band gaps, IPs, and EAs are reported in Table . These are in good agreement with previous estimations and with experimental values. The IP is used to align the band structure of both materials against the vacuum level, providing a first estimation of the band discontinuity at the interface. Figure a and b reveal a staggered gap (type II heterojunction) at the WS 2 /WSe 2 interface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Including the standard errors in fitting, the above equation can be best represented as E g = (1.02 ± 0.02)­eV + (0.84 ± 0.15)­eV exp­(− N /(3.20 ± 0.64)). It is also worth noting that the extracted transport gaps as determined in the present study are in general smaller than those inferred from optical experiments, ,, a curious observation that deserves a more detailed comparison between electrical and optical data analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Including the standard errors in fitting, the above equation can be best represented as E g = (1.02 ± 0.02)eV + (0.84 ± 0.15)eV exp(−N/(3.20 ± 0.64)). It is also worth noting that the extracted transport gaps as determined in the present study are in general smaller than those inferred from optical experiments,[16][17][18][19]46,47 a curious observation that deserves a more detailed comparison between electrical and optical data analysis.CONCLUSIONSIn conclusion, we have experimentally demonstrated ionic liquid gated Schottky barrier FETs on WSe 2 from various flake thicknesses. Excellent device characteristics with steep inverse subthreshold slopes close to the thermal limit of 60 mV/dec at room temperature have been obtained.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The photoemission spectra show that the top of the valence band of WSe 2 is characterized by an intense band that has a maximum at the Γ point 1.25 ± 0.1 eV of binding energy and then on its way toward the K point separates into two sub-bands that reach a maximum in K, at a BE of 0.85 ± 0.1 eV and 1.35 ± 0.1 eV, respectively as determined by fit of the single valence band spectra (see Figure b and Figure c). Interestingly, we observe a rather large splitting of the two spin polarized bands at the K point, which is 0.50 ± 0.10 eV and is slightly larger than the value observed for the bulk material. , The effective mass of electrons in the two spin polarized bands was determined to be 0.40 ± 0.2 m e and 0.70 ± 0.2 m e in the upper and lower band, respectively (see Figure S5), which are suitable values for the development of spintronics devices.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…When bilayer WSe 2 is formed on EG, regardless of the number of the layers of the support, we can observe the expected change in the band structure that is typical of many TMDCs. , The K and the Γ point are almost at the same energy, which is 1.30 ± 0.1 eV, below the Fermi energy. Moreover, at the Γ point a new band is observed, which is located at a BE of 1.95 eV (see Figure a–c).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%