2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.86.2482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Observation of Predicted Resonance Structure in theH+D2HD(v=

Abstract: Erratum: Observation of Predicted Resonance Structure in the H 1 D 2 ! HD͑ ͑ ͑y 0 5 0, j 0 5 7͒ ͒ ͒ 1 D Reaction at a Collision Energy of 0.94 eV [Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4325 (2000)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. Kendrick et al (105,106) also examined the H + D 2 reaction in which HD(v = 0, j = 7) was detected in a velocity-sensitive manner, from which the integral cross section was estimated between a collision energy of 0.73 eV and 1.02 eV. They observed a bump (∼50% variation) in the integral cross section that agreed well with their calculations (partial waves up to J = 6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. Kendrick et al (105,106) also examined the H + D 2 reaction in which HD(v = 0, j = 7) was detected in a velocity-sensitive manner, from which the integral cross section was estimated between a collision energy of 0.73 eV and 1.02 eV. They observed a bump (∼50% variation) in the integral cross section that agreed well with their calculations (partial waves up to J = 6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Conventional wisdom based on a large body of calculations for this reaction system, as well as other isotopic variants, has brought these results into question. It now seems clear that after summation of partial waves up to J = 30-35, no structure remains in the ICS energy dependence for the HD(v = 0, j = 7) product state (106). This conclusion has been independently obtained from the NGP QM calculations of Chao et al Kendrick (109) has analyzed in detail how partial wave summation affects stateresolved ICSs and DCSs for the H + D 2 reaction.…”
Section: An Old Problem Revisited: Does Resonance Structure In the Inmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In particular, a time-delayed mechanism for the forward angle scattering of the HD(v f ¼ 3, j f ¼ 0) final rovibrational state has been of much interest 1,37,38,82,83 (for other recent research on this reaction, see ref. [84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96]. The next section applies the glory theory of section II to the angular scattering of the state-to-state transition…”
Section: Forward Glory Scattering In the H + D 2 ! Hd + D Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a general resonance signature is as of yet unknown, it is clear that state-and/or angle-resolved measurements are required. Recently, Shafer-Ray and co-workers 41 observed a peak in the integral cross section ͑ICS͒ versus energy for the reaction HϩD 2 →DϩHD (vЈϭ0, jЈϭ7), which also appeared in the calculations of Kendrick, that seemed to indicate resonance. To investigate the proposed resonance interpretation, we 42 ͑and also Aoiz et al 43 and Kendrick 44 ͒ have performed a fully converged quantum scattering calculation wherein the theoretical peak disappeared, suggesting the observation might be an artifact of the experimental sensitivity function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%