2001
DOI: 10.1063/1.1369154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “Nuclear spin–spin coupling in the acetylene isotopomers calculated from ab initio correlated surfaces for J1(C, H), J1(C, C), J2(C, H), and J3(H, H)” [J. Chem. Phys. 112, 3735 (2000)]

Abstract: Prediction of spin-spin coupling constants in solution based on combined density functional theory/molecular

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that this rather poor performance of SOPPA(CCSD) to reproduce numerical experimental values of 1 J(C-1,C-2) in propynal oximes is due to the fact that one of the coupled carbons is that of the triple bond which meets specific computational difficulties at this level of approximation. 16,17 On the other hand, it might be due to the relatively small basis set used for coupled carbons in the present study as well as to the marked solvent effects on 1 J(C,C) involving the sp-hybridized carbons, as reported by Jackowski et al 18 (TMS) and nitromethane, respectively. Carbon-carbon coupling constants were measured from the 13 C satellites in the proton-decoupled 13 C NMR spectra and also using the Figure 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It seems that this rather poor performance of SOPPA(CCSD) to reproduce numerical experimental values of 1 J(C-1,C-2) in propynal oximes is due to the fact that one of the coupled carbons is that of the triple bond which meets specific computational difficulties at this level of approximation. 16,17 On the other hand, it might be due to the relatively small basis set used for coupled carbons in the present study as well as to the marked solvent effects on 1 J(C,C) involving the sp-hybridized carbons, as reported by Jackowski et al 18 (TMS) and nitromethane, respectively. Carbon-carbon coupling constants were measured from the 13 C satellites in the proton-decoupled 13 C NMR spectra and also using the Figure 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It must however, be considered that the theoretical results have not taken into account neither the vibrational effects, which can constitute up to 10% of the results, nor solvent effects . One must keep this in mind when comparing the results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, motion of molecular systems, internal rotation of substituents, and vibrations of molecules should be taken into account with a view to obtain appropriate calculated NMR parameters. The contribution of molecular vibrations was estimated by some authors at 10% of the overall value [35,36]. Isotope composition and temperature also exert some effect on the chemical shifts and spinspin coupling constant, so that these factors should also be taken into account.…”
Section: Effect Of Solventmentioning
confidence: 99%