2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.74.029902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Nuclear equation of state [Phys. Rev. C57, 3020 (1998)]

Abstract: There is a typographical error in Eq. (8). It should readThe rest of the paper is not affected; in particular the table is correct.We thank A. P. Hayes of the University of Maine for bringing this error to our attention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
271
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
14
271
1
Order By: Relevance
“…from Po to Uuo ) in the framework of the Wolfenstein-Hauser-Feshbach model, making use of a variety of different mass and fission barrier predictions (Myers & Swiatecki 1999;Mamdouh et al 2001;Aboussir et al 1995;Möller et al 1995;Howard & Möller 1980;Goriely et al 2009). The astrophysical (stellar) reaction rates were fitted as in previous works (Thielemann et al 1987;Rauscher & Thielemann 2000) in the common REACLIB seven parameter form, and these parameters are also tabulated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…from Po to Uuo ) in the framework of the Wolfenstein-Hauser-Feshbach model, making use of a variety of different mass and fission barrier predictions (Myers & Swiatecki 1999;Mamdouh et al 2001;Aboussir et al 1995;Möller et al 1995;Howard & Möller 1980;Goriely et al 2009). The astrophysical (stellar) reaction rates were fitted as in previous works (Thielemann et al 1987;Rauscher & Thielemann 2000) in the common REACLIB seven parameter form, and these parameters are also tabulated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, different mass-and fission barrier predictions were utilized to test the sensitivity stemming from different underlying models. The models used are: masses taken from the Finite Range Droplet Model (FRDM) by Möller et al (1995), the Extended Thomas-Fermi with Strutinsky Integral (ETFSI) model by Aboussir et al (1995), and the Thomas-Fermi (TF) model of Myers & Swiatecki (1996); fission barriers are taken from the ETFSI (Mamdouh et al 2001) and TF (Myers & Swiatecki 1999) models. It should be emphasized that the ETFSI masses employed here (http://www-astro.ulb.…”
Section: Neutron-induced Fission Rates For a Variety Of Mass Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same way the macroscopic components of fission barriers for the heavier nuclei from Rn to Th were obtained, but in this case only very asymmetric combinations were considered in the SM analysis. These data are shown in Figure 6 together with the predictions of different models [30,[44][45][46][47] and tabulated values [48] for the macroscopic barriers (bottom panels). Shell corrections calculated in [17] and those obtained in the framework of the present analysis (see Section 2) could be also compared (upper panels).…”
Section: Er Production In the Vicinity Of N=126 Shellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macroscopic fission barriers derived with the SM analysis of the ER and fission cross sections measured in very asymmetric reactions leading to the Rn * , Fr * , Ra * and Th * compound nuclei (different symbols with error bars correspond to the observed CN evaporation chains). Lines correspond to the LD [30], empirical [44], finite-range [45] (FR), Thomas-Fermi [46] (TF) and Lublin-Strasbourg drop [47] (LSD) model calculations performed for these nuclei (bottom panels). Refs to the experimental data obtained in reactions leading to the Rn * , Fr * , Ra * and Th * compound nuclei can be found in [49], [50], [12,33] and [34,49], respectively.…”
Section: Heaviest Nuclei Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(9) is the universal function, independent of the shapes of nuclei or the geometry of the nuclear system, but depends on the minimum separation distance s 0 . The universal function is taken from Myers and Swiatecki [17], as …”
Section: The Preformed Cluster Model (Pcm)mentioning
confidence: 99%