2003
DOI: 10.1071/am03227_er
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ERRATUM: New records of Hastings River mouse Pseudomys oralis from State Forest

Abstract: IN Meek et al. (2003), the authors would like to clarify there was no suggestion in the use of the words "observer bias" on page 104 that Read (1993) had spurious morphological data. Instead we were referring to the consistent minor variations that can occur when different researchers measure similar parameters.

Help me understand this report

This publication either has no citations yet, or we are still processing them

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?

See others like this or search for similar articles