2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.73.049904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Neutrino reactions on the deuteron [Phys. Rev. C 63, 034617 (2001)]

Abstract: The cross sections for the ν−d andν−d reactions are calculated for the incident energy up to E ν = 170 MeV, with the use of a phenomenological Lagrangian approach. We assess and improve the reliability of the employed calculational method by examining the dependence of the results on various input and approximations that go into the calculation. The main points of improvements over the existing work are: (1) use of the "modern" NN potentials;(2) use of the more accurate nucleon weak-interaction form factors; (… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
156
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
19
156
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows from table 6 that our cross sections for the reaction (13) are in a very good agreement with the EFT [23] and [27] calculations. This confirms our conjecture that the treatment of the Coulomb interaction between protons [23] in the reaction (12) is not correct.…”
Section: Reactionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It follows from table 6 that our cross sections for the reaction (13) are in a very good agreement with the EFT [23] and [27] calculations. This confirms our conjecture that the treatment of the Coulomb interaction between protons [23] in the reaction (12) is not correct.…”
Section: Reactionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, while our cross sections and the cross section [27] are smooth functions of the neutrino energy, the EFT cross section exhibits abrupt changes in the region 7 < E ν < 12 MeV. In our opinion, the reason can be an incorrect treatment of the Coulomb interaction between protons in the EFT calculations.…”
Section: Reactionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note as a final remark that the constant term for the radiative correction to the ratio of neutral to charged current reaction (after the usual outer correction [5,7] for the charged current reaction ) is −0.6%, which may be compared with the claimed error (0.5%) of nuclear calculations for the ratio of tree level cross sections [12].…”
Section: The Constant Term Of Radiative Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%