2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.106.159903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum:J/ψandψ(2S)Radiative Transitions toηc

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The η c elastic form factor is normalized to F ηc→ηc + (0) = 1 by elastic vector-current conservation. Our determination of the ψ → η c transition form factor V ηc→ψ (0) = 1.80, describing the ψ → η c γ radiative transition, is in reasonable agreement with both the data [22] and the lattice-QCD result [23], in spite of some tension between these two findings: V exp (0) = 1.68 ± 0.14 vs. V lat (0) = 1.92 ± 0.03 ± 0.02. N.B.…”
Section: The ηCηcj/ψ and ηCj/ψj/ψ Strong Couplingssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The η c elastic form factor is normalized to F ηc→ηc + (0) = 1 by elastic vector-current conservation. Our determination of the ψ → η c transition form factor V ηc→ψ (0) = 1.80, describing the ψ → η c γ radiative transition, is in reasonable agreement with both the data [22] and the lattice-QCD result [23], in spite of some tension between these two findings: V exp (0) = 1.68 ± 0.14 vs. V lat (0) = 1.92 ± 0.03 ± 0.02. N.B.…”
Section: The ηCηcj/ψ and ηCj/ψj/ψ Strong Couplingssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…At BESIII, using 106 million ψ(2S) decays, the line-shape of the ηc(1S) was found to be clearly distorted (see the right panel of Figure 6). Taking into account the expected E 7 energy-dependence of the radiated photon (58), and including interference with the non-ηc(1S) background, the mass was found to be 2984.3 ± 0.6 ± 0.6 MeV/c 2 (59), more in line with other measurements, and resolving the previous discrepancy. The lower statistics of the previous measurements apparently hid these important effects.…”
Section: Masses Of Charmonium Statessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Theoretical studies have highlighted the presence of and E 7 dependence in the matrix elements for these transition, that can indeed distort the η c (1S ) lineshape. The disagreement disappears if an additional dumping factor E 2 ) is added to the η c (1S ) lineshape [47] (points o) and p) ). Possibly the same effect is also present in bottomonium, but to confirm this additional non-M1 based measurements of the η b (1S ) mass are required.…”
Section: New Hadronic Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…B → η b X (blue points): f) BaBar [53], g) Belle [54]. M1 transitions J/ψ → γη c (1S ) and ψ → γη c (1S ) (black dots): h) i) BES [55], l) BES [56], m) CLEO [47]. E1 transition h c (1P) → γη c (1S ) (green dot): n) [57].…”
Section: New Hadronic Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation