Erratum: Measurement of the electron charge asymmetry in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo accent="true" stretchy="false">¯</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow>

Abazov, V. M.; Abbott, B.; Acharya, B. S.; Adams, M.; Adams, T.; Agnew, J. P.; Alexeev, G. D.; Alkhazov, G.; Alton, A.; Askew, A.; Atkins, S.; Augsten, K.; Ávila, C.; Badaud, F.; Bagby, L.; Baldin, B.; Bandurin, D. V.; Banerjee, S.; Barberis, E.; Baringer, P.; Bartlett, J.F.; Bassler, U.; Bazterra, V. E.; Bean, A.; Begalli, M.; Bellantoni, L.; Beri, S. B.; Bernardi, G.; Bernhard, R.; Bertram, I.; Besançon, M.; Beuselinck, R.; Bhat, P. C.; Bhatia, S.; Bhatnagar, V.; Blazey, G.; Blessing, S.; Bloom, K.; Boehnlein, A.; Boline, D.; Boos, E.; Borissov, G.; Borysova, M.; Brandt, A.; Brandt, O.; Brock, R.; Bross, A.; Brown, D. N.; Bu, X. B.; Buehler, M.; Buescher, V.; Bunichev, V.; Burdin, S.; Buszello, C. P.; Camacho-Pérez, E.; Casey, B. C.K.; Castilla‐Valdez, H.; Caughron, S.; Chakrabarti, S.; Chan, K. M.; Chandra, A.; Chapon, É.; Chen, G.; Cho, S. W.; Choi, S.; Choudhary, B. C.; Cihangir, S.; Claes, D. R.; Clutter, J.; Cooke, M.; Cooper, W. E.; Corcoran, M.; Couderc, F.; Cousinou, M. C.; Ćutts, D.; Das, A.; Davies, G.; Jong, Sijbrand J. de; Cruz-Burelo, E. De La; Déliot, F.; Démina, R.; Denisov, D.; Denisov, S. P.; Desai, S.; Deterre, C.; Devaughan, K.; Diehl, H. T.; Diesburg, M.; Ding, P. F.; Domínguez, A.; Dubey, A.; Dudko, L.; Duperrin, A.; Dutt, S.; Eads, M.; Edmunds, D.; Ellison, J.; Elvira, V. D.; Enari, Y.; Evans, H. C.; Евдокимов, В. Н.; Fauré, Alexandre; Liu, Feng; Ferbel, T.; Fiedler, F.; Filthaut, F.; Fisher, Wade Cameron; Fisk, H. E.; Fortner, M.; Fox, H.; Fuess, S.; Garbincius, P. H.; García-Bellido, A.; García-González, J. A.; Gavrilov, V.; Geng, W.; Gerber, C. E.; Gershtein, Y.; Ginther, G.; Gogota, O.; Golovanov, G.; Grannis, P. D.; Greder, S.; Greenlee, H.; Grenier, G.; Gris, Ph.; Grivaz, J.-F.; Grohsjean, A.; Grünendahl, S.; Grunewald, M; Guillemin, T.; Gutiérrez, G.; Gutiérrez, P.; Haley, J.; Liu, Han; Harder, K.; Harel, A.; Hauptman, J. M.; Hays, J.; Head, T.; Hebbeker, T.; Hedin, D.; Hegab, H.; Heinson, AP; Heintz, U.; Hensel, C.; Cruz, I. Heredia-De La; Herner, K.; Hesketh, G. G.; Hildreth, M.; Hirosky, R.; Hoang, T.; Hobbs, J.; Hoeneisen, B.; Hogan, J. M.; Hohlfeld, M.; Holzbauer, J. L.; Howley, I.; Hubáček, Z.; Hynek, V.; Iashvili, I.; Ilchenko, Y.; Illingworth, R.; Ito, A. S.; Jabeen, S.; Jaffré, M.; Jayasinghe, A.; Jeong, M. S.; Jesik, R.; Jiang, Peng; Johns, K. A.; Johnson, Emily; Johnson, M.; Jonckheere, A.; Jönsson, P.; Joshi, J.; Jung, Andreas Werner; Juste, A.; Kajfasz, E.; Karmanov, D.; Katsanos, I.; Kaur, M.; Kehoe, R.; Kermiche, S.; Khalatyan, N.; Khanov, A.; Kharchilava, A.; Kharzheev, Y. N.; Kiselevich, I.; Kohli, J. M.; Kozelov, A. V.; Kraus, J.; Kumar, Ashish; Kupčo, A.; Kurča, T.; Kuzmin, V.; Lammers, S.; Lebrun, P.; Lee, H. S.; Lee, S. W.; Lee, W. M.; Lei, X.; Lellouch, J.; Li, D.; Li, H.; Li, L.; Li, Q. Z.; Lim, J.; Lincoln, D.; Linnemann, J. T.; Lipaev, V. V.; Lipton, R.; Liu, H.; Liu, Y.; Lobodenko, A.; Lokajı́ček, M.; de, Rafael; Luna-García, R.; Lyon, A. L.; Maciel, A. K.A.; Madar, R.; Magaña-Villalba, R.; Malik, S.; Malyshev, V. L.; Mansour, J. D.; Martínez-Ortega, J.; McCarthy, R. L.; McGivern, C. L.; Meijer, M. M.; Melnitchouk, A.; Menezes, D.; Mercadante, P. G.; Merkin, M.; Meyer, A.; Meyer, J.; Miconi, F.; Mondal, N. K.; Mulhearn, M.; Nagy, E.; Narain, M.; Nayyar, R.; Neal, H. A.; Negret, J. P.; Neustroev, P.; Nguyen, Huong Thi Thanh; Nunnemann, T.; Orduna, J.; Osman, N.; Osta, J.; Pal, A.; Parashar, N.; Parihar, V.; Park, S. K.; Partridge, R.; Parua, N.; Patwa, A.; Penning, B.; Perfilov, M.; Peters, Y.; Petridis, K.; Petrillo, G.; Pétroff, P.; Pleier, M.-A.; Podstavkov, V. M.; Попов, А. В.; Prewitt, M.; Price, D.; Prokopenko, N.; Qian, J.; Quadt, A.; Quinn, B.; Ratoff, P. N.; Razumov, I.; Ripp-Baudot, I.; Rizatdinova, F.; Rominsky, M.; Ross, A.; Royon, C.; Rubinov, P.; Ruchti, R.; Sajot, G.; Sánchez-Hernández, A.; Sanders, M. P.; Santos, A. S.; Savage, G.; Savitskyi, M.; Sawyer, L.; Scanlon, T.; Schamberger, R. D.; Scheglov, Y.; Schellman, H.; Schwanenberger, C.; Schwienhorst, R.; Sekaric, J.; Severini, H.; Shabalina, E.; Shary, V.; Shaw, S. M.; Shchukin, A. A.; Šimák, V.; Skubic, P.; Slattery, P.; Smirnov, D.; Snow, G. R.; Snow, J.; Snyder, S.; Söldner-Rembold, S.; Sonnenschein, L.; Soustružnı́k, K.; Stark, J.; Stoyanova, D. A.; Strauss, M.; Suter, L.; Svoisky, P.; Titov, M.; Tokmenin, V. V.; Tsai, Y. T.; Tsybychev, D.; Tuchming, B.; Tully, C.; Uvarov, L.; Uvarov, S.; Uzunyan, S.; Kooten, R. Van; Leeuwen, W. M. Van; Varelas, N.; Varnes, E. W.; Vasilyev, I. A.; Verkheev, A. Y.; Vertogradov, L. S.; Verzocchi, M.; Vesterinen, M.; Vilanova, D.; Vokáč, P.; Wahl, H. D.; Wang, M. H. L. S.; Warchol, J.; Watts, G.; Wayne, M.; Weichert, J.; Welty-Rieger, L.; Williams, Mark Richard James; Wilson, G. W.; Wobisch, M.; Wood, D.; Wyatt, T. R.; Xie, Y.; Yamada, R.; Yang, S.; Yasuda, T.; Yatsunenko, Y. A.; Wentao, Ye,; Ye, Z.; Yin, H.; Yip, K.; Youn, S. W.; Yu, J.; Zennamo, J.; Zhao, T.; Zhou, B.; Zhu, J.; Zieliński, M.; Ziemińska, D.; Živković, L.

doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.079901

Cited by 28 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While the results of ATLAS, CMS and CDF are in very good agreement with each other 11 , a tension at the 3σ level can be observed w.r.t. the most precise measurement of DØ [261].…”

Section: Discussion Of Recent Top Quark Mass Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electroweak precision tests of the Standard Model after the discovery of the Higgs boson

Erler

Schott

2019

Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The global fit of the Standard Model predictions to electroweak precision data, which has been routinely performed in the past decades by several groups, led to the prediction of the top quark and the Higgs boson masses before their respective discoveries. With the measurement of the Higgs boson mass at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in 2012 by the ATLAS and CMS collaborations, the last free parameter of the Standard Model of particle physics has been fixed, and the global electroweak fit can be used to test the full internal consistency of the electroweak sector of the Standard Model and constrain models beyond. In this article, we review the current state-of-the-art theoretical calculations, as well as the precision measurements performed at the LHC, and interpret them within the context of the global electroweak fit. Special focus is drawn in the impact of the Higgs boson mass on the fit.

show abstract

“…While the results of ATLAS, CMS and CDF are in very good agreement with each other 11 , a tension at the 3σ level can be observed w.r.t. the most precise measurement of DØ [261].…”

Section: Discussion Of Recent Top Quark Mass Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electroweak precision tests of the Standard Model after the discovery of the Higgs boson

Erler

Schott

2019

Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, it does not change the functional form of the extraction for x B < 0.8. As [13,46], corresponding to Q 2 = m 2 W . This may indicate a tension between our low Q 2 results and results of the CJ15 analysis of the D∅ dataset at x B ≥ 0.6.…”

Section: Universal Nucleon Modification and The Emc Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neutron Valence Structure from Nuclear Deep Inelastic Scattering

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The partonic structure of the nucleon in the valence region is studied using a global analysis of nuclear deep inelastic scattering (DIS) data on the proton and on nuclei from A = 2 (deuterium) to 208 (lead) to account for the modification of the structure function of nucleons bound in atomic nuclei (i.e. the EMC effect). As compared to previous analyses that only use proton and deuterium data, we find a larger valence down-quark contribution at high-xB. The neutron-to-proton structure function ratio F n 2 /F p 2 is extracted for xB = 0.2−0.9, with an xB → 1 limit of 0.47±0.04, in agreement with predictions such as those of perturbative QCD and Dyson Schwinger equation expectations, but in disagreement with predictions such as the scalar di-quark dominance model. Predictions are also made for F 3 He 2

show abstract

“…The LHCb measurement of the inclusive charge asymmetry [47] probes larger values of x than at ATLAS or CMS. Currently the main constraints on u and d content at x > 0.1 come primarily from fixed-target DIS experiments and the D0 inclusive lepton charge asymmetry data [48]. The inclusion of the latest Tevatron results in PDF fits generally results in a harder u/d behaviour in this high-x region [49].…”

Section: Distributions Differential In Pseudorapiditymentioning

confidence: 99%

Vector boson production in association with a jet at forward rapidities

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Final states with a vector boson and a hadronic jet allow one to infer the Born-level kinematics of the underlying hard scattering process, thereby probing the partonic structure of the colliding protons. At forward rapidities, the parton collisions are highly asymmetric and resolve the parton distributions at very large or very small momentum fractions, where they are less well constrained by other processes. Using theory predictions accurate to next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in QCD for both and production in association with a jet at large rapidities at the LHC, we perform a detailed phenomenological analysis of recent LHC measurements. The increased theory precision allows us to clearly identify specific kinematical regions where the description of the data is insufficient. By constructing ratios and asymmetries of these cross sections, we aim to identify possible origins of the deviations, and highlight the potential impact of the data on improved determinations of parton distributions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7010-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Erratum: Measurement of the electron charge asymmetry inpp¯→W+X→eν+X

Cited by 28 publications

References 0 publications

Electroweak precision tests of the Standard Model after the discovery of the Higgs boson

Electroweak precision tests of the Standard Model after the discovery of the Higgs boson

Neutron Valence Structure from Nuclear Deep Inelastic Scattering

Vector boson production in association with a jet at forward rapidities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About