2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4874264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “Measurement of local internal friction in metallic glasses” [J. Appl. Phys. 115, 134307 (2014)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed descriptions of the theory and calculations of the indentation modulus and damping are given elsewhere [ 4 , 23 24 ]. In particular for measuring contact damping, the cantilever model must be taken into account [ 8 ], and this has been applied recently to metallic glasses by Wagner et al [ 24 ].…”
Section: Measurement Of Elastic Stiffness and Damping Through Afammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Detailed descriptions of the theory and calculations of the indentation modulus and damping are given elsewhere [ 4 , 23 24 ]. In particular for measuring contact damping, the cantilever model must be taken into account [ 8 ], and this has been applied recently to metallic glasses by Wagner et al [ 24 ].…”
Section: Measurement Of Elastic Stiffness and Damping Through Afammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed descriptions of the theory and calculations of the indentation modulus and damping are given elsewhere [ 4 , 23 24 ]. In particular for measuring contact damping, the cantilever model must be taken into account [ 8 ], and this has been applied recently to metallic glasses by Wagner et al [ 24 ]. They have successfully demonstrated a quantitative approach to determine the local internal friction or loss at a nanometer scale, using the evaluation procedure of the cantilevers distributed mass model with damped flexural modes on amorphous PdCuSi metallic glass.…”
Section: Measurement Of Elastic Stiffness and Damping Through Afammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations