Erratum: Management of obstructive sleep apnea in an edentulous patient with a combination of mandibular advancement splint and tongue-retaining device: a clinical report

Kurtulmuş, Hüseyin; Çötert, Hamit Serdar

doi:10.1007/s11325-010-0471-z

Cited by 5 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…140 retracted articles out of 180 (77.8%) are still available in full text on respective journal websites, and 15 of these still available articles (10.7%) present no evident watermark clearly indicating the presence of a retraction (Acharya & Mandal, ; Asgary & Eghbal, ; Cuoghi, Sella, & de Mendonça, ; Dionysopoulos, Koliniotou‐Koumpia, Helvatzoglou‐Antoniades, & Kotsanos, ; Ellakwa & El‐Sheikh, ; Gulsahi et al, ; Khattab, El‐Seify, Shaaban, Radojevic, & Jankovic, ; Kurtulmus & Cotert, ; Nayyar, Khan, Bafna, Ahmed, & Chaluvaiah, ; Ni, Lin, Liu, & Xiao, ; Palenik, ; Scotti, Cardelli, Baldissara, & Monaco, ; Sumanth et al, ; Wang et al, ). The abstracts of 157 out of 180 retracted publications (87.2%) are still available on Pubmed, but 8 of these (5.1%) present neither a footnote nor any clear indication of the presence of a retraction notice (Agrawal, Singh, Rashmikant, Singh, & Chand, ; Dumitrescu, Zetu, & Teslaru, ; Ehrlich et al, ; Kumar et al, ; Maté Sánchez de Val et al, ; Rabanal, Bral, & Goldstein, ; Wang et al, ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review

Rapani

Lombardi

Berton

et al. 2020

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The present systematic review aimed to perform an in‐depth analysis of the different features of retracted publications in the dental field. Material and methods This review has been recorded in the PROSPERO database (CRD42017075634). Two independent reviewers performed an electronic search (Pubmed, Retraction Watch) for retracted articles in dental literature up to December 31, 2018. Results 180 retracted papers were identified, the first published in 2001. Retractions increased by 47% in the last four‐year period (2014–2018), when compared with 2009–2013 (94 and 64 retracted publications, respectively). Author misconduct was the most common reason for retraction (65.0%), followed by honest scientific errors (12.2%) and publisher‐related issues (10.6%). The majority of retracted research was conducted in Asia (55.6%), with 49 papers written in India (27.2%). 552 researchers (89%) are listed as authors in only one retracted article, while 10 researchers (1.6%) are present in five or more retracted publications. Retracted articles were cited 530 times after retraction: the great majority of these citations (89.6%) did not consider the existence of the retraction notice and treated data from retracted articles as reliable. Conclusions Retractions in dental literature have constantly increased in recent years, with the majority of them due to misconduct and fraud. The publication of unreliable research has many negative consequences. Studies derived from such material are designed on potentially incorrect bases, waste funds and resources, and most importantly, increase risk of incorrect treatment for patients. Citation of retracted papers represents a major issue for the scientific community.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review

Rapani

Lombardi

Berton

et al. 2020

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…16 Kurtulmus & Cotert (2009), described a clinical and laboratory method for producing a new non-adjustable, acrylic monobloc functional splint combining a tissue borne mandibular advancement splint (MAS) and a tongue retaining device with custom-made tongue-tip housing for an edentulous patient with obstructive sleep apnea. 17 Piskin et al (2010), reported a fabrication method and treatment efficacy of an acrylic, monobloc, modified mandibular advancement device (MAD), which acts by displacing bulky masseter muscles laterally, to provide more space for tongue on totally edentulous patient with severe OSA. 18 Implant supported oral appliances for completely edentulous patients Hoekema et al (2007), described an implant retained two piece mandibular repositioner appliance (MRA) as a viable treatment modality of edentulous obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) patients.…”

Section: Review Of Oral Appliance Therapy In Complete and Partially Ementioning

confidence: 99%

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): A prosthodontic perspective

Mohan¹,

Gowda

Banari

2015

Medical Journal Armed Forces India

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…To date, some reports have already described the employment of OAs in fully edentulous patients (14–17). However, the indication of this sort of treatment for partially edentulous patients has hardly been mentioned in the literature, making of it an important issue to be addressed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea patients with severe dental condition

Ogawa

Ito

Cardoso

et al. 2010

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This clinical report introduces and evaluates the use of a mandibular advancement oral appliance (OA) attached to a denture base for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) in a patient presenting severe dental problems and multiple missing teeth. It concerned a 58-year-old man with moderate OSAS (apnoea index (AI): 15·9 h(-1) ; apnoea hypopnea index (AHI): 21·7 h(-1) ), presenting ten remaining teeth (maxilla: 5, mandible: 5) and important dental and periodontal problems. A treatment OA comprising both maxillary and mandibular parts was fabricated with an acrylic resin base, simulating the structure of a conventional removable partial denture (RPD). The polysomnography examination performed after the use of the OA showed the treatment induced a significant decrease in OSAS symptoms (AI: 0·7 h(-1) , AHI: 8·2 h(-1) ). All the necessary dental and periodontal treatments were performed to assure the reestablishment of oral health. The treatment OA was modified after each treatment to adapt it to each new oral condition. After 18 months, once the oral health was reestablished with seven remaining teeth (maxilla: 5, mandible: 2), final RPDs and final OA were fabricated. Polysomnography with final OA showed a similar positive result with respect to OSAS symptoms. No side effects related to the OA treatment were detected during the 3-year follow-up. To keep a sound oral condition, periodical dental care was performed by specialists in both periodontal and prosthodontic clinics. This clinical report shows the feasibility of treating OSAS patients with OA even in the presence of severe oral conditions and multiple missing teeth.

show abstract

Erratum: Management of obstructive sleep apnea in an edentulous patient with a combination of mandibular advancement splint and tongue-retaining device: a clinical report

Abstract: This article has been retracted because of duplicate publication in different journals.

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review

Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): A prosthodontic perspective

Oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea patients with severe dental condition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About