1983
DOI: 10.1063/1.444566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Laser double resonance measurements of vibrational energy transfer rates and mechanisms in HF(v=2) [J. Chem. Phys. 77, 3974 (1982)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the combination of bolometer microcalorimetry (comparing the energy content of the two fragments as determined by the relative bolometer signals) and the energetics implied by the angular distributions, we have shown that the small angle portion of these distributions is entirely due to channels corresponding to j HF ) 11. The fact that the ratios of the sum of the DF to HF internal plus surface sticking energies are approximately the same for the (2,11), (1,11), and (0,11) channels (namely, 0.351, 0.341, and 0.335, respectively) explains why the ratios of the intensities of the first and second peaks are the same on the HF and DF sides of the angular distribution. Given that the ratio of the HF to DF signals is approximately constant for all corresponding angles, we conclude that the additional structure at larger angles must be due to channels with similar ratios to those given above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From the combination of bolometer microcalorimetry (comparing the energy content of the two fragments as determined by the relative bolometer signals) and the energetics implied by the angular distributions, we have shown that the small angle portion of these distributions is entirely due to channels corresponding to j HF ) 11. The fact that the ratios of the sum of the DF to HF internal plus surface sticking energies are approximately the same for the (2,11), (1,11), and (0,11) channels (namely, 0.351, 0.341, and 0.335, respectively) explains why the ratios of the intensities of the first and second peaks are the same on the HF and DF sides of the angular distribution. Given that the ratio of the HF to DF signals is approximately constant for all corresponding angles, we conclude that the additional structure at larger angles must be due to channels with similar ratios to those given above.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The heights of the vertical bars in Figure 4 give the probabilities for the various channels. It is interesting to note that the probabilities for the (2,11) and (3,10) channels are rather similar even though the intensities of the corresponding peaks are very different, the latter being much weaker. This can be understood by considering that the higher kinetic energy associated with the (3,10) channel results in scattering into a larger solid angle compared with (2,11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations