2017
DOI: 10.1038/nature25191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Large emissions from floodplain trees close the Amazon methane budget

Abstract: In this Letter, owing to an error during the production process, the surname of author Humberto Marotta was incorrectly listed as 'Ribeiro'. This has been corrected in the author list and the Author Contributions section of the original Letter.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The omission of GHG fluxes from trees may overestimate the sink potential (Pitz & Megonigal, 2017) and underestimate the release (Covey et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2016) of GHGs from upland and wetland forests, respectively. For instance, tree-mediated CH 4 emissions have been shown to contribute 9-27% (Pangala et al, 2015) and 44-65% (Pangala et al, 2017) of the total ecosystem CH 4 flux in forested temperate and tropical wetlands, respectively. In the broader context of global carbon budgets, forest ecosystems were estimated to emit 6.7 ± 1.1 Pg C/year as CO 2 from tree stems (Yang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The omission of GHG fluxes from trees may overestimate the sink potential (Pitz & Megonigal, 2017) and underestimate the release (Covey et al, 2012;Wang et al, 2016) of GHGs from upland and wetland forests, respectively. For instance, tree-mediated CH 4 emissions have been shown to contribute 9-27% (Pangala et al, 2015) and 44-65% (Pangala et al, 2017) of the total ecosystem CH 4 flux in forested temperate and tropical wetlands, respectively. In the broader context of global carbon budgets, forest ecosystems were estimated to emit 6.7 ± 1.1 Pg C/year as CO 2 from tree stems (Yang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at present there are currently no published studies on gross primary productivity and net primary productivity in the Cuvette Centrale peatlands. This is not a problem unique to this region; across the globe, few studies have tried to quantify the full carbon budget of a tropical peatland (Bocko et al, 2017;Dargie et al, 2017;Pangala et al, 2017).…”
Section: Peatland Carbon Stocks and Cyclingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overlying vegetation also influences peatland GHG emissions: first, by providing substrates for the soil heterotrophic population through litterfall and roots (Girkin et al, 2018). Second through species-specific adaptations found in flood-tolerant plants in tropical peat swamp forest that increase gas exchange under waterlogged conditions, such as enlarged lenticels (stem pores), the presence of aerenchyma (spongy, porous tissue) and pneumatophores (aerial roots specialised for gas exchange; Pangala et al, 2017). These adaptations can affect fluxes by either increasing oxygenation in the rooting zone, potentially increasing CO 2 production or decreasing CH 4 production, or by providing a physical pathway through which CH 4 , produced belowground, can travel to the atmosphere (Girkin et al, 2020).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%