2007
DOI: 10.1086/521221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “Infrared Counterparts toChandraX‐Ray Sources in the Antennae” (ApJ, 658, 319 [2007])

Abstract: In equation (2), we incorrectly labeled one of the variables. Equations (1) and (2) should read:These equations were used only to explain our image frame-tie method, and this change does not affect our results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compact objects tend to be associated with massive star formation, which some theories suggest is predominant in young stellar clusters (Lada & Lada 2003). In previous work on the Antennae we find a close association between compact objects and clusters, identifying 15 possible IR counterparts to X-ray sources (Clark et al 2007). Many of these counterparts reside in the spiral arms and 'bridge' region of the Antennae -locations predominant in massive star formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compact objects tend to be associated with massive star formation, which some theories suggest is predominant in young stellar clusters (Lada & Lada 2003). In previous work on the Antennae we find a close association between compact objects and clusters, identifying 15 possible IR counterparts to X-ray sources (Clark et al 2007). Many of these counterparts reside in the spiral arms and 'bridge' region of the Antennae -locations predominant in massive star formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Those X-ray sources without counterparts could be compact objects that escaped their parent cluster or remained behind after their cluster dissolved. In Clark et al (2007) we suggest a third possibility, that some X-ray sources do have counterparts, but these are too faint to see in the IR images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that of the 19 X-ray sources with counterparts, two are the nuclei , one is a background quasar (Clark et al 2005), and two share the same IR counterpart. Therefore, in this paper we only consider the 15 IR counterparts (of the original 19) that are star clusters in the Antennae.…”
Section: Infrared Imagesmentioning
confidence: 87%