2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9aee
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: “First Search for Gravitational Waves from Known Pulsars with Advanced LIGO” (2017, ApJ, 839, 12)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We build on these efforts and use the constraints on GR deviations obtained by the LIGO-Virgo collaboration (LVC) [30] to analyze whether these two theories can be constrained with the binary BH events detected during the first two observation runs of the LVC. More specifically, we will consider the binary BH events in the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1 GW150914 [31,32], GW151226 [33], GW170104 [34], GW170608 [35] and GW170814 [36] for which the posteriors on theory-independent GR modifications, obtained through a Markov-Chain-Monte-Carlo (MCMC) exploration of the parameter space, have been made public [3,37]. Quadratic gravity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We build on these efforts and use the constraints on GR deviations obtained by the LIGO-Virgo collaboration (LVC) [30] to analyze whether these two theories can be constrained with the binary BH events detected during the first two observation runs of the LVC. More specifically, we will consider the binary BH events in the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1 GW150914 [31,32], GW151226 [33], GW170104 [34], GW170608 [35] and GW170814 [36] for which the posteriors on theory-independent GR modifications, obtained through a Markov-Chain-Monte-Carlo (MCMC) exploration of the parameter space, have been made public [3,37]. Quadratic gravity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That said, we explicitly note that in the case of a black hole resulting from a binary neutron star merger of total mass ∼ 2.7 M [35], we expect the dominant ringdown frequency and hence the central frequency f 0 of the echoes to be above 6000 Hz, i.e. above our prior upper bound, but also much beyond the detectors' frequency reach for plausible energies emitted [36]. Foreground and background analyses with a correspondingly high frequency range are left for future work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To date, the advanced GW detectors have only been able to observe the inspiral of the two NSs [39,40] and no postmerger signal has been observed. This nonobservation is caused by the higher emission frequency at which current GW detectors are less sensitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%