2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.74.019902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Energy loss of charm quarks in the quark-gluon plasma: Collisional vs radiative losses [Phys. Rev. C72, 014905 (2005)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
197
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
197
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Renk derives phenomenological limits on radiative vs. collisional energy loss by considering quadratic vs. linear pathlength dependence and concludes that any elastic energy loss component has to be small [14]. In contrast, Mustafa and Thoma find that collisional energy loss has a significant influence on jet quenching [15,16]. Recent studies by Gyulassy and collaborators also point in this direction, see e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Renk derives phenomenological limits on radiative vs. collisional energy loss by considering quadratic vs. linear pathlength dependence and concludes that any elastic energy loss component has to be small [14]. In contrast, Mustafa and Thoma find that collisional energy loss has a significant influence on jet quenching [15,16]. Recent studies by Gyulassy and collaborators also point in this direction, see e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Among the novelties presented was the work by K. Tuchin, who discussed heavy quark production in High Parton Density QCD in a quasi-classical approximation, including low-x quantum evolution, as well as heavy-quark production based on the effect of pair production in external fields [108]. For moderate transverse momenta (p T ≤ a few GeV/c) the energy loss of heavy quarks is thought to be dominated by inelastic collisions with medium constituents, rather than gluon radiation [109,110], because the heavy quarks are not ultra-relativistic and gluon radiation is suppressed by the so-called dead-cone effect [111]. These findings were highlighted in a comprehensive analysis of the non-photonic electron nuclear suppression factors measured at RHIC presented by M. Djordjevic [112,113].…”
Section: Heavy-quark Production Diffusion and Energy Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partial failure of radiative, perturbative energy loss led to renewed interest in energy loss from elastic collisions [13][14][15], although a self-consistent treatment of elastic and radiative energy loss in one proper unified theoretical framework is still under construction. It has also ushered in a period of renewed interest in nonperturbative mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%