2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.64.079903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Electrical conductivity and thin film growth dynamics [Phys. Rev. B61, 11 109 (2000)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider a thin film of two rough surfaces with thickness d, which its thickness is smaller than the mean free path of the electron. The thin film crosses the z-axis at d/2 and −d/2, with z 1 ( r) = d/2 + h 1 ( r) and z 2 ( r) = −d/2 + h 2 ( r), where h 1 and h 2 are the random roughness fluctuations of surface 1 and 2 respectively with h( r) = 0 Palasantzas et al (2000). Note that the choice of the quantum mechanical formulation in this limitation is due to the fact that the thickness layer is smaller than the mean free path of the electron.…”
Section: Inverse Methods For Measuring the Thin-films Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consider a thin film of two rough surfaces with thickness d, which its thickness is smaller than the mean free path of the electron. The thin film crosses the z-axis at d/2 and −d/2, with z 1 ( r) = d/2 + h 1 ( r) and z 2 ( r) = −d/2 + h 2 ( r), where h 1 and h 2 are the random roughness fluctuations of surface 1 and 2 respectively with h( r) = 0 Palasantzas et al (2000). Note that the choice of the quantum mechanical formulation in this limitation is due to the fact that the thickness layer is smaller than the mean free path of the electron.…”
Section: Inverse Methods For Measuring the Thin-films Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the choice of the quantum mechanical formulation in this limitation is due to the fact that the thickness layer is smaller than the mean free path of the electron. In this case the electrons would scatter from the surface before being scattered by the bulk electrons Palasantzas et al (1997Palasantzas et al ( , 2000. The conductivity relation for the case where the surface roughness ω is considered much smaller than the film thickness d (ω ≪ d)) is Palasantzas et al (2000)…”
Section: Inverse Methods For Measuring the Thin-films Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations