Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2015.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Degradation of potent Rubisco inhibitor by selective sugar phosphatase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, losing a valuable active site has reduced the capacity for carbon fixation of the host organism. RuBP is not the only inhibitory substrate, a palette of other sugar phosphates, including some generated by misfire-reactions of Rubisco itself, also tightly bind to the active site (Parry et al, 2008; Andralojc et al, 2012; Bracher et al, 2015). The affinity of the inhibitors is correlated with the enzyme's catalytic parameters, and based on the data available “superior” high specificity Rubiscos bind RuBP and other sugar phosphates more tightly than the low specificity enzymes with more flexible active sites (Pearce and Andrews, 2003; Pearce, 2006).…”
Section: The Emerging Requirement For Catalytic Chaperonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, losing a valuable active site has reduced the capacity for carbon fixation of the host organism. RuBP is not the only inhibitory substrate, a palette of other sugar phosphates, including some generated by misfire-reactions of Rubisco itself, also tightly bind to the active site (Parry et al, 2008; Andralojc et al, 2012; Bracher et al, 2015). The affinity of the inhibitors is correlated with the enzyme's catalytic parameters, and based on the data available “superior” high specificity Rubiscos bind RuBP and other sugar phosphates more tightly than the low specificity enzymes with more flexible active sites (Pearce and Andrews, 2003; Pearce, 2006).…”
Section: The Emerging Requirement For Catalytic Chaperonesmentioning
confidence: 99%