Erratum: Cross sections for the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>Σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>reaction at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>γ</mm

Hleiqawi, I.; Hicks, K.; Carman, D. S.; Mibe, T.; Niculescu, G.; Tkabladze, A.; Amarian, M.; Ambrozewicz, P.; Anghinolfi, M.; Asryan, G.; Avakian, H.; Bagdasaryan, H.; Baillie, N.; Ball, J.; Baltzell, N. A.; Batourine, V.; Battaglieri, M.; Beard, K.; Bedlinskiy, I.; Bellis, M.; Benmouna, N.; Berman, B. L.; Biselli, A.; Bouchigny, S.; Boiarinov, S.; Bradford, R.; Branford, D.; Briscoe, W. J.; Brooks, W. K.; Bültmann, S.; Burkert, Volker; Butuceanu, C.; Calarco, J. R.; Careccia, S. L.; Carnahan, B.; Chen, S.; Cole, P. L.; Collins, P.; Coltharp, P.; Crabb, D.; Crannell, H.; Credé, V.; Cummings, J. P.; Masi, R. De; Vita, R. De; Sanctis, E. De; Degtyarenko, P. V.; Dennis, L.; Deur, A.; Djalali, C.; Dickson, R.; Dodge, G. E.; Donnelly, J.; Doughty, D.; Dugger, M.; Dytman, S.; Dzyubak, O. P.; Egiyan, H.; Egiyan, K. S.; Elouadrhiri, L.; Eugenio, P.; Fedotov, G.; Feldman, G.; Fersch, R.; Feuerbach, R. J.; Garçon, M.; Gavalian, G.; Gilfoyle, G. P.; Giovanetti, K. L.; Girod, F. X.; Goetz, J. T.; Gönenç, A.; Gothe, R. W.; Griffioen, K. A.; Guidal, M.; Guler, N.; Guo, L.; Gyurjyan, V.; Hakobyan, R.; Hardie, J.; Heddle, D.; Hersman, F. W.; Holtrop, M.; Hyde-Wright, C. E.; Ilieva, Y.; Ireland, D. G.; Ишханов, Б. С.; Ito, M. M.; Jenkins, David; Jo, H. S.; Joo, K. S.; Juengst, H. G.; Kalantarians, N.; Kellie, J.D.; Khandaker, M.; Kim, K.; Kim, W.; Klein, A.; Klein, F. J.; Klimenko, A. V.; Kossov, M.; Krahn, Z.; Kramer, L. H.; Kubarovsky, V.; Kühn, J.; Kuhn, S. E.; Kuleshov, S.; Lachniet, J.; Laget, J. M.; Langheinrich, J.; Lawrence, D.; Li, J.; Livingston, K.; Lu, H. Y.; Lukashin, K.; MacCormick, M.; McAleer, S.; McKinnon, B.; McNabb, J. W. C.; Mecking, B. A.; Mestayer, M. D.; Meyer, C. A.; Mikhailov, K.; Minehart, R.; Mirazita, M.; Miskimen, R.; Mokeev, V.; Moriya, K.; Morrow, S. A.; Moteabbed, M.; Mutchler, G. S.; Munévar, E.; Nadel-Turoński, P.; Nasseripour, R.; Niccolai, S.; Niculescu, I.; Niczyporuk, B.; Niroula, M. R.; Niyazov, R. A.; Nozar, M.; Osipenko, M.; Ostrovidov, A. I.; Park, K.; Pasyuk, E.; Paterson, C.; Pierce, J.; Pivnyuk, N.; Pogorelko, O.; Pozdniakov, S.; Preedom, B. M.; Price, J. W.; Prok, Y.; Protopopescu, D.; Raue, B. A.; Riccardi, G.; Ricco, G.; Ripani, M.; Ritchie, Barry; Ronchetti, F.; Rosner, G.; Rossi, P.; Sabatié, F.; Salgado, C.; Santoro, J. P.; Sapunenko, V.; Schumacher, R. A.; Serov, V. S.; Sharabian, Y. G.; Smith, E. S.; Smith, L. C.; Sober, D. I.; Stavinsky, A.; Stepanyan, S. S.; Stokes, B. E.; Stoler, P.; Strakovsky, I. I.; Strauch, S.; Taiuti, M.; Taylor, S.; Tedeschi, David; Thoma, U.; Thompson, R.; Todor, L.; Tkachenko, S.; Tur, C.; Ungaro, M.; Vineyard, M. F.; Vlassov, A. V.; Wang, K.; Weinstein, L. B.; Weygand, D. P.; Whisnant, S.; Williams, M.; Wolin, E.; Wood, M. H.; Yegneswaran, A.; Zana, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, B.; Zhao, Z. W.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.76.039905

Cited by 20 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The cutoff masses for the phenomenological form factors in Eq. (19) are determined to reproduce the experimental data for the total and differential cross sections for the K Ã0 AE þ channel from the CBELSA/TAPS [12] and CLAS [14] collaborations. The determined cutoff masses are listed in Table II.…”

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The black circles denote the CBELSA/TAPS [12] data. We estimate the total cross sections from the CLAS data [14] for the differential cross sections, which are represented by the open squares, based on the interpolating polynomial method to the fourth order. Our result shown by the solid line is in a good agreement with the CBELSA/TAPS data up to around E $ 2:1 GeV.…”

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…K Ãþ AE 0 process. Note that its production strength is a little smaller than that of the [12], whereas the open squares represent the estimated values extracted from the CLAS data [14]. The total cross sections for p !…”

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[25], we then can compute the strong coupling constants for the resonances. The signs of these strong coupling constants are determined by fitting the experimental data [12,14], as will be shown in the next section. We list all the parameters of the resonances in Table I.…”

Section: Formalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…K Ã Ãð1116Þ by the CLAS Collaboration at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (Jefferson Lab) [10,11], and N ! K Ã AEð1193Þ by the CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration at the Electron Stretcher and Accelerator (ELSA) [12], by the CLAS Collaboration [13,14], and by the LEPS Collaboration at Super Photon Ring-8 GeV (SPring-8) [15]. These two processes have been extensively studied theoretically within the effective Lagrangian approaches [16][17][18][19], as well as in the chiral quark model [20].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

K*Σphotoproduction off the proton target with baryon resonances

Kim

Nam

Hosaka³

et al. 2013

Phys. Rev. D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigate the photoproduction of K Ã0 AE þ and K Ãþ AE 0 off the proton target, employing the effective Lagrangian approach at the tree-level Born approximation. In addition to the ðs; t; uÞ-channel Born diagrams, we take into account various baryon-resonance contributions such as D 13 ð2080Þ, S 11 ð2090Þ, G 17 ð2190Þ, D 15 ð2200Þ, S 31 ð2150Þ, G 37 ð2200Þ, F 37 ð2390Þ, and AE Ã ð1385; 3=2 þ Þ in a fully covariant manner. We present the numerical results for the energy and angular dependences for the cross sections in comparison to available experimental data. The single-polarization observables, i.e., the photon-beam (AE ), recoil (P y ), and target (T y ) baryon polarization asymmetries are computed as well for future experiments. We observe from the numerical results that the resonance contributions play a minor role in producing the strength of the cross sections, being different from the K Ã Ã photoproduction. In contrast, it turns out that the Áð1232Þ-pole contribution and K exchange in the t channel dominate the scattering process. On the other hand, the higher resonances influence the polarization observables such as the recoil and target asymmetries.

show abstract

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Formalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

K*Σphotoproduction off the proton target with baryon resonances

Kim

Nam

Hosaka³

et al. 2013

Phys. Rev. D

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Contribution of N* and Δ* Resonances in $${K^*\Sigma}$$ (1190) Photoproduction

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this talk, we report theoretical studies on the K * 0 Σ + (1190) photoproduction in the tree-level Born approximation, employing the effective Lagrangian method. We present the energy and angular dependences of the cross sections. It turns out that the N * and ∆ * resonance contributions are negligible in the vicinity of the threshold. On the contrary, we observe that the κ and K exchanges in the t channel and ∆(1232) in the s channel dominate the scattering process, reproducing the experimental data qualitatively well.

show abstract

Hyperon Photo- and Electro- Production Experiments at CLAS

Schumacher¹

2010

Nuclear Physics A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Developments in strangeness photo-and electro-production off the proton, as investigated using the CLAS system in Hall B at Jefferson Lab, are discussed in this paper. By measuring sufficient spin observables one can decompose the reaction mechanism into elementary amplitudes. We discuss progress toward this end in recent data from CLAS, including cross sections and spin observables. We next discuss new results on the mass distribution of the Λ(1405), which shows signs of being a composite meson-baryon object of mixed isospin. The work on other hyperons such as the Ξ resonances will be mentioned, and future prospects outlined.

show abstract

Erratum: Cross sections for theγp→K*0Σ+reaction atEγ

Cited by 20 publications

References 6 publications

K*Σphotoproduction off the proton target with baryon resonances

K*Σphotoproduction off the proton target with baryon resonances

Contribution of N* and Δ* Resonances in $${K^*\Sigma}$$ (1190) Photoproduction

Hyperon Photo- and Electro- Production Experiments at CLAS

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About