2017
DOI: 10.1038/ng0217-317a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: Corrigendum: Mutational signatures in esophageal adenocarcinoma define etiologically distinct subgroups with therapeutic relevance

Abstract: In the version of this article initially published online, the mutation signature illustrations for S1 and S2 in Figure 3a were switched. Additionally, in the Online Methods, the text originally stated that structural variants were called using BWA-MEM, when it should have stated that these were called using BWA. These errors have been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, only 15.9% (10/63) of GCs with signature 18* have CDH1 mutations. In addition, signature 18* was prevalent in the whole-genome region of EAC 18 and coding region of neuroblastoma 19 , whereas CDH1 mutation rarely occurred in these two types of cancer. These data supported the hypothesis that CDH1 mutation is a cause rather than a consequence of signature 18*.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, only 15.9% (10/63) of GCs with signature 18* have CDH1 mutations. In addition, signature 18* was prevalent in the whole-genome region of EAC 18 and coding region of neuroblastoma 19 , whereas CDH1 mutation rarely occurred in these two types of cancer. These data supported the hypothesis that CDH1 mutation is a cause rather than a consequence of signature 18*.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, we found a primary tumor to associate with SBS4 (tobacco smoking) and a metastatic tumor to associate with SBS17b. The latter signature is of unkown aetiology, but previous studies have associated it with 5FU chemotherapy treatment and to damage inflicted by reactive oxygen species ( 65 ). As expected, we found ~3.6-times higher number of SBSs among metastatic tumors compared to primary ones (121,175 vs 33,796 SBSs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESCA is the sixth most common cause of cancer deaths ( 39 ). Despite recent advances in molecular marker diagnostics, radiomics, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy, the long-term survival rates of patients with ESCA remain relatively poor ( 4 6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%